First: IN SALES (Yup,I'm a sheep and I like math, a horrible combination)

Halo 1 and 2 sold 6 and 8 million copies. That's good, but not amazing. (Although OoT had sold 8 before VC came)

Second, something will top Halo this generation. When was the last time something from year 2 beat all other games? Even Gears would not have been more than 9.2 (From same reviewer) today.

Third: This does not make sense. In advance people predicted a tie score from MP and halo. Instead Halo recieved 9.5 and Mp 8.5. Therefore, people seem to think that Halo should have had an 8.0 and Mp a 9/9.5

If both recieved a 9 everyone would have been happy.

Does really 0.5 matter that much?

[QUOTE="Kenny789"]Finally, a different Earthbound character. Hope his movesets aren't the same as Ness'murat8

The creater confirmed that there would be no clones. (Although, Lucas may take Ness' moveset if Ness doesn't make it)

Or! Lucas takes ness's old and ness gets a new one

And it's not japan only, it's just that the games aren't in NA (they are in Norway and Spain

[QUOTE="GarchomPro"]I hope this is a joke threadRickyStackz

I don't.

Carlos Mencia is funnier.

Cheese smells funnier

[QUOTE="ArcticSnake"]Wow TC, you really don't know what you are doing do you? Let me bring your attention to World in Conflict. You know, that game that got a 9.5 and is so far changing the RTS genre as we know it? Yeah, that game was built around multiplayer and so far I am having a blast on the multiplayer that requires teamwork and strategy. Seriously, how is this game that has already more then proven itself not on that list confuses me.PullTheTricker

RTS games are underrated. Games like Civilization, Rome Total War and Age of Empire are mostly played by adults. Needless to say its not as popular as other genres.

Yeah... WiC is so underrated... 9.5 is crap

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="mistervengeance"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="mistervengeance"]

userscores are more accurate

because they take more opinions into account

for instance mario kart 64 did not deserve the obscenely low score it got.

gears of war did not deserve the insanely high score it got

BreakingPoint8

no. people give games 1s and 10s far too often.

yeah..... and

You're guilty of it.

Not really...

[QUOTE="oyvoyvoyv"]

[QUOTE="Llama_713"]But you have to buy like 50 phones on different networks to play all the best games! That will be like 6000 dollars lulz.Llama_713

50 Phones for 20 games? How?

/sarcasm/

/Irony/

Wow, people reaaaly are in posting mood today...

6K for a PC?elektrixxx

Yeah... 1k is 1024 so sure 6144 dollars for a PC... Why not?