patofeo1's forum posts

Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
Game of teh year to a game that is 90% Desert? plz, Mass effect brings more to teh table, more action, more peace, more Characters.
Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
Set up Camp.Choose Travel to DestinationNo need to Travel for a Long time.

Or you could Travel and kill stuff like Rabbits, Hawks, Cougars(DON'T), and Wolves and stuff, Save People, Capture more Horses, Capture Convicts, etc.

Seriously are you even playing the game?

LegatoSkyheart
wow, so pretty Much u skip the purpose of the entire Game, the purpose is to bring the West feeling back to you, but u wanna skip the Rides and go straigth to missions? LAME
Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
first all, GTA is different, u get more for what u pay, more cars, more people, more building, more Missions, GTA is more deep. I feel Red Dead is just Empty, i mean come on, how can u give a GOTY to a Game that has 90% Desert Graphics, and only 4% of the game was spent in Character Animation, and Storyline. Plz.
Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
Honestly, i can't see y people love this Game, The game is 90% desert and 10% Towns, There's more Dirt than Action. Cinematic scenes last Longer than their in Game Mission. Traveling? is not Fun, u ride a horse for to long and u only see Desert and Hills, u get to a town the size of a 20 people in it. Game Feels Empty.
Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
Microsoft owns 40% of Apple.
Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
Microsoft is no longer a monopoly, and with companies like Apple and Google around, I don't see how it could ever possibly build one again.meetroid8
fer real? are u serious? Microsoft has the most Money, they can Buy Apple 40 times its current sell Value. Thye got Skype 1 week ago and now Sprint communications.
Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
^^^ correct
Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
[QUOTE="ImportBMWRacer"][QUOTE="ZIMdoom"]

I'm not sure how this impacts anything. The whole antitrust thing has never been an issue because Bush came into office and pretty much dropped the whole thing. So MS was let off with a slap on the wrist at worst.

The reason Apple and Google have risen above MS has nothing to do with the antitrust. MS has always been successful because they had a stranglehold on the OS market. ANything else they tried to do has always failed if they couldn't tie it back into Windows. Apple, on the other hand has managed to develop a whole string of very successful and market changing products like Ipod and Ipad, etc. What does MS have? Zune? Please.

Google has rapidly risen because they have been able to make money and success on markets nobody really focused much on before, like Search engines and street maps and cell phone software.

BOTH Apple and google have been successful because of their innovation and creativity and willingness to take risks. These are things MS has never been good at and never been successful with ever. MS has always been about buying other people's ideas, tying it into windows, and then using that market to choke out competition. The problem is that the prevalence of PC's and OS's for PCs has fallen in control. People now have way more options for technology and getting onto the internet than PCs and the OS tied to those PCs. Which leaves MS way behind and with little to no idea of what to do.

As a result, you see them desperately trying to play catch up and copy what others are doing. Zune, windows 7 for smartphones, tablets, etc. The only success they've had so far was with the 360, and even still, when the original Xbox came out, MS spent a lot of time and money trying to prove they were the "me too" console to the PS2 by trying to buy up a lot of IPs that were once PS exclusive. But look at now, after all that moneytheir top games are games that are original to them.

* AJAX * Web browser component usable by any app * OLE * Spreadsheet Pivot Tables * Tabbed spreadheets (since then, copied by other apps such as browsers) * On-the-fly spell check in word processors * LINQ (the upcoming tech that will be in C# 3.0 and VB9) * Video codec innovations that have led to VC-1 being the premier codec for HD-DVD and BR discs. * Mouse scroll wheels * Mouse GoForward/GoBack buttons * Ergonomic mice (I recall the days where you had to press down on a mouse while moving it in order to move the cursor; Microsoft ended that nonsense). * Ergonomic keyboards * Office 2007 UI * Mac Office floating palette UI * TerraServer (precursor of Virtual Earth, NASA WorldWind, Google Earth) * Ability to alter compiled code while debugging it * User Agents * Wizards * Intellisense * Answer Wizard technology in Office Help * ClearType * TrueType (collaboration with Apple) * Bob (yeah, it failed in the marketplace, but it was innovative (too much for its own good)) * Dynamic HTML desktops * Taskbar * Alt-Tab to switch apps * Lots of small innovations in .NET that when combined equal large cumulative innovation. * ActiveX (yes, it had security issues, particularly before XP SP2, but is great in an intranet setting) * Net-DDE, the first tech to allow clipboard functionality over LAN * Singularity * Combining the Back and Forward history buttons into one navigation stack control in IE7 * Photosynth * XPS (does everything that PDF does, adds graphical effects that PDF lacks, does it in a smaller file size, and does it using XML so the files can be manipulated via XML parsers) * Windows Live Contacts (being developed by Danny Thorpe (legendary programmer at Borland, who jumped to Google, then 4 months later went to Microsoft)) * A bunch of little stuff in IM via MSN Messenger * OneNote (I don't think there's any other app really like it (and those that try to be like it aren't anywhere near as good), particuarly when used on a Tablet PC) * Mac Word 2004's notebook layout and microphone support * Zune's WiFi (yes, the RIAA only allowed 3play/3day sharing, but its use will grow into other areas) * First console to have a harddrive (Xbox) * Browser runs in a sandbox (IE7 on Vista) * First browser with anti-phishing tech * Multi-core/CPU calculations in Excel 2007 * XNA * Vista's ability to allow the user to increase RAM simply by plugging in a USB 2.0 flash drive * First OS to support delayed clipboard rendering * First OS to have a 3D Sound api for games * Shadow Copy * Media Center Extenders (which iTV looks to be a copy of) ~scobleizer~ Outdated, yet still plenty of innovation there. Not to mention DirectX should be a godsend for any PC gamer. Unification is HUGE, and MIcrosoft is the one who gives us standards that allow for ease of use, cheaper & greater products.

Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
Microsoft, is gonna dominate the Cellphone Market with their Windows Phones by 2015, It will b Windows, then second Android and Third Apple.
Avatar image for patofeo1
patofeo1

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 patofeo1
Member since 2011 • 65 Posts
[QUOTE="chewy130"]That had nothing to do with the anti-trust settlement. They could of bought Skype before the settlement. On wiki it said the case resulted in the release of the MS OS code or something.

o god, antitrust is u cant have a monopoly, Microsoft used to control all of what we used to use on their Windows OS. b4 1998 Now we can use google, apple apps, etccc on our windows Os Now microsoft can ban all this apps if they like, since they r free from the law of 1998, buying Skype is just the beginning, Microsoft can buy Sprint and make a sprint cell provider exclusive with Skype and Office outlook with Windows os. This is monopoly, and thsi si what Microsoft was prohibit of doing, now they can do it.