That dev's screens are always 90% photoshops. They do it so much and to such an extreme that it really borders on false advertisement. Their games look good but nowhere near as good as their bullshots.
I've played the first one and I definitely agree on all the faults people had with the game but I could tell they had some good ideas and I liked the concept, the game just had very bad execution. Seems like they are at least fixing all the problems people had with the first game even if it doesn't stand up to COD4, Gears, or H3 in the single player game. But maybe in the next 6 months they will improve AI or one of a number of things that could bring the experience up to a higher level, that to me would be enough. Or maybe not, whatever. The thing I think people need to realize though is that we haven't heard a peep about the multiplayer, and if it ends up a badass experience I'm not sure how much people will care that the single player is just okay to pretty good. Still I'd like to see it excel in both.
Doom 4 already? Thats pretty badass. I honestly think it has a chance to be a much better game than 3 after all the complaints. I also wanna see what they can do with the Rage engine when they push it to the limits.
[QUOTE="pooonu"]I love how the Nintendo fanboys pounce on the topic creator using the Wii's popularity with old women, as if that somehow justifies its existence. The Wiimote sucks ass. Most of the movements you do in games don't get picked up, and the ones that do are so retarded you can't help but laugh at yourself for looking so stupid. Nintendo half assed the motion controls because they knew the Wii was a gamble. By some grace of god or, more likely, deal with the devil they've received ridiculous hype and success for a console that offers 3 good exclusive games (I'm probably being generous) and crap gimmicky controls as its selling point. If MS want to do the motion control thing, they should do it right. Make the controller comfortably conform to your hand, while giving you the full range of motion control that people actually think of when they hear the words 'motion control'. No stupid waggling to replace button presses, my god what a gimmick. How about when I move my arm like im rolling a bowling ball the game actually picks up that motion instead of reading a generic force = character bowls action like in the Wii. Is that really too much to ask? Apparently for Nintendo it is. But go ahead fanboys and attack me and others for wanting something better than the trash Nintendo fed you. bf2nutta
lol so on Tuesday I will be playing GTA4.... yet I enjoy the Wii Remote when used correctly in games like No More Heroes, MP3, MOH Heroes and Zack and Wiki.... What does that make me...... I know what it doesn't and thats some jumped little fanboy who isn't willing try different things in gaming because its "kiddy" or "graphix suck" or "its a casual system"
So what am I ?
I didn't say you couldn't get enjoyment out of using the Wiimote, you are playing games with it afterall. I'm just saying it sucks at its proposed function. Which is motion controls. I mean the NES controller also sucked, and was very uncomfortable, but I'll be damned if I didn't have fun playing Super Mario 3 with it.
[QUOTE="pooonu"]I love how the Nintendo fanboys pounce on the topic creator using the Wii's popularity with old women, as if that somehow justifies its existence. The Wiimote sucks ass. Most of the movements you do in games don't get picked up, and the ones that do are so retarded you can't help but laugh at yourself for looking so stupid. Nintendo half assed the motion controls because they knew the Wii was a gamble. By some grace of god or, more likely, deal with the devil they've received ridiculous hype and success for a console that offers 3 good exclusive games (I'm probably being generous) and crap gimmicky controls as its selling point. If MS want to do the motion control thing, they should do it right. Make the controller comfortably conform to your hand, while giving you the full range of motion control that people actually think of when they hear the words 'motion control'. No stupid waggling to replace button presses, my god what a gimmick. How about when I move my arm like im rolling a bowling ball the game actually picks up that motion instead of reading a generic force = character bowls action like in the Wii. Is that really too much to ask? Apparently for Nintendo it is. But go ahead fanboys and attack me and others for wanting something better than the trash Nintendo fed you. eklineage
You hurt my feelings. LOL
My bad. Just typical system wars embellishment. Nothing personal. :face_hug:
Log in to comment