well luckily its not microsoft who makes the gamesShane Kim admitted last year that Microsoft doesn't know how to do MMOGs
Bluray001
porzdeadline's forum posts
DC Universe online and now Final Fantasy which are both coming to PS3 and PC yet not 360 ?
does microsoft think that tha a 360 version would take away from the PC version ?
can i tell you a little secret buddy ;)? huxley, age of conan hyborian adventure and apb are all mmo games... even thoguh i think huxley is vaporware and im not sure about age of conanthe city, new mombasa, in halo odst is open world :shock:! i always wondered what an open world halo game would be like... but i hope they give you a lot of unique areas to explore and items to find, even though i know it is not an rpg. it is said that you can tackle your objectives any way you would like. and i am already very excited to ambush covenant squads :D
http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/989/989479p2.html
[QUOTE="porzdeadline"][QUOTE="humber_matus"] How is you OPINION better then ours?humber_matusoh my god did i say?!? this reminds me of arguing with little kids :D ill just give it a rest but all i was trying to say that when claiming who won the press conference you shouldnt be judging that by exclusives (which we already knew about ) but by surprises and how entertaining the show was what would you say if i said 'i think the wii conference was more entertaining than the ms conference and they showed off more unknown games' , its a stupid argument, we can't ADMIT anything since these are our opinions. Its like asking a religious person to admit that god doesn't exist. Sure i may be 100% positive that he doesn't, but the OPINION will still stand. even though what you are saying is true... i just want people with for instance a wii to be able to say "oh yea the sony or ms conference was good" etc. because if we would go by what you said the lemmings would find mss the best, the cows sonys and the sheep nintendos. but come to think of it that is they way it is for the most people in this forum because a sheep is not gonna be interested by things that are good for xbox 360 because he doesnt own an xbox 360
I agree that Nintendo has won game-wise. The show was pretty lame though and it missed Miyamoto's pressence. But in the end it's all about the games amirite? So I guess Nintendo has won with Microsoft as a close second for showing project natal which has great possibilities.Wesliiok so judging by system wars the winner is the one who shows the most exclusives... okay? but by most gamespot users in general i think the copy and paste facepalm thing during the whole nintendo conference showed how much they won. i dont care if ms and sony showed less games than nintendo but the way they showed their games is more entertaining... and in the end i want to be entertained... if that wouldnt be the case then i could just as well read about all the announcments in the internet and have just as much fun
So MS won with Forza 3 and 2 Halo's because it was fun looking at multiplats the rest of the show? No. Sony had a way more solid lineup of games, only on the PS3. Mag, GT5, GoW III, U2, Modnation, The Agent, The Last Guardian plus it gets all the multiplats like LP2, Metal Gear Rising etc.
did you read anything i wrote? no apperantly you didnt! the lineup of a company does not automatically make the press conference good or exciting.... natal, halo reach, crackdown 2 were surprising announcments. plus even if it is multiplat mgr is a good thing and so is alan wake The point of E3 isn't having fun watching Rock Band concerts, it's getting new games, new game info, new products. and like i said i thought the rockstar part of ms press conference was broing... but the ms announcments were the most surprising... plus no one can tell me the nintendo conference was better than sonds and mss because they showed the most amount of games? project natal and mgr are probably the biggest things at this years e3 and both were shown by mircosoft (even if mgr is multiplat its still a pro for the 360)[QUOTE="porzdeadline"][QUOTE="humber_matus"]You are asking people to admit one conference was better than the other even though you have your own preference. How is you opinion better then ours?humber_matusbecause im not looking at it this way "microsoft pwnsss" or anything like that i am judging this off which press conference entertained me the most and wasnt a complete borefest. and tbh in the beginnign i thought the ms press conference was horrible with the beatles game but after that joy ride game every announcment was a surprise. nintendo was just completly boring and sony could have been so much better if they hadnt shown all those diashows and talked about sales.... and i thought the psp part was pretty boring How is you OPINION better then ours? oh my god did i say?!? this reminds me of arguing with little kids :D ill just give it a rest but all i was trying to say that when claiming who won the press conference you shouldnt be judging that by exclusives (which we already knew about ) but by surprises and how entertaining the show was
did you read anything i wrote? no apperantly you didnt! the lineup of a company does not automatically make the press conference good or exciting.... natal, halo reach, crackdown 2 were surprising announcments. plus even if it is multiplat mgr is a good thing and so is alan wakeSo MS won with Forza 3 and 2 Halo's because it was fun looking at multiplats the rest of the show? No. Sony had a way more solid lineup of games, only on the PS3. Mag, GT5, GoW III, U2, Modnation, The Agent, The Last Guardian plus it gets all the multiplats like LP2, Metal Gear Rising etc.
Eddie-Vedder
You are asking people to admit one conference was better than the other even though you have your own preference. How is you opinion better then ours?humber_matusbecause im not looking at it this way "microsoft pwnsss" or anything like that i am judging this off which press conference entertained me the most and wasnt a complete borefest. and tbh in the beginnign i thought the ms press conference was horrible with the beatles game but after that joy ride game every announcment was a surprise. nintendo was just completly boring and sony could have been so much better if they hadnt shown all those diashows and talked about sales.... and i thought the psp part was pretty boring
in the perspective of games... yes of course nintendo would always win just because most of their games are exclusives but i wouldnt say their press conference was in any way exciting or good... and i wouldnt say halo reach, natal, crackdown 2 and the metal gear game are not surprising announcmentsMS had a lot of good games
but most of the games we knew about already.. (splintercell and alan wake for example)
the only new games were L4D2 and Crackdown 2..and a mario kart clone
and NATAL was just vaporware..
Nintendo had mario galaxy 2, metroid, mobido, new mario bros wii, wii fit plus, wii sports resort.. seriously. the lineup was just astonishing this year.
nintendo could have just thrown in a lot of the third party exclusives they have (like muramasa, silenthill, little king story, red steel, rabbids go home, shaun white, drawn to life wii, a boy and his blob to mention a few) in a trailer reel. but they didnt because they dont need to..Sony had.. Agent, FF XIV and a mario kart clone.. and a waggle wand that looked worse then NATAL
nintendo hands down..
farnham
Log in to comment