[QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]Metal Gear Solid 4 and Halo are not overrated just because you don't like them. That just means your tastes don't line up with the critics. _rpg_FAN
I'd disagree with that. What lends a gaming "journalist's" opinion more clout than mine? As a whole they've proven themselves to be a combination of both corrupt and incompetent on a fairly consistent basis. I agree there's a difference between a game being "overrated" and someone simply not liking the title in question, but that doesn't mean a game can't be overrated. gaming journalist played 90% of games ever released Their job is to play games they play good games, but they also play cr*py games "regular" people like you and me mostly play only games they think they will like so gaming jurnalsits have lot more knowledge about games, and such that is one of the best comments i have honestly seen on SW, and just when i had giving all hope up
[QUOTE="Ringx55"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] I doubt the AI actually gets smarter when set to a higher difficulty. Usually the game compensates by making the bullets do more damage and the enemy taking more damage. One of the only FPS's I know of right now that actually seems like it makes the AI smarter is Crysis, if there's any others, let me know.DragonfireXZ95
Anybody that has played Halo on very easy then legendary will tell you this : It gets a lot harder, a lot of games do this and yes they do add other factors too such as health and ammo etc... Not the first Halo, it just made it so you die faster, made the enemies better shots and added health to the enemies. Halo 3 may be another story, but I never played that one on legendary. Can anyone vouch for this? thats a real yes and no, enemys do more damage, but are way more agressive and a bit smarter. For the most part though they just do more damage
Its an ARCADE game.Do you not notice the ARCADE part?It should in no way be scored or compared to a regular game as it has much different standards then a retail game.
PS:Braid deserved its score.
Jrfanfreak88
Which I understand, but if this is the case why are the PSN games getting low scores? I mean if we are going to have two sets of review standards I could name at least 3 or 4 PSN games that should have 9's or higher.
thats a good question but i wouldint think about it so much, but you razed a good point. I think in its surface braid was just a platfromer with amazing visuals and music, but its when you look beneth that you see why it gets a 9.5, because because braid was never about platfroming, it was about telling a story.
I don't have Fable 2, but I got Fallout 3 today. I'm hoping it gets better. :? Without spoiling anything, I've completed 2 hours and I'm doing nothing but menial, tedious tasks. AvIdGaMeR444
it never really gets better sadly some action packed stuff but i felt kinda flat another thing i hated was the setting, it felt forced, small amounts of black humor that were unfunny and the stats bonus on cloths is stupid
[QUOTE="Jodan77"]
Fable 2 if you actually enjoy playing good games.
/flame shield
epic_pets
Yea cause a 8.5 is a good game while a game rated 9 is a bad game:roll:
look at the critic score and the user score they both say 9, dont leave your scoring up to one person
[QUOTE="gunswordfist"]Uh...where's the list of PS3 games for 2009?! I'm not bashing you with the comment. I'm a Sony fan myself. W/o a list, I can't be excited about PS3 myself so I won't be interested enough to buy one. So I'll have to stick with 360 for now. At least show me a least of third party companies that will support Sony in '09.eisenhiem
I will do that later but exspect it it will be epic. LOL. PS3 will own 2009 in every way shape and form.
every single year i hear that sentence, il go digging for some quotes
Log in to comment