@punksterdaddy: Choose your battles dude. This isn't worth the time or energy... or much of anything really.

I guess I was too literal for the likes of you. Let me rephrase it for the simpletons: anything that has already been done to death. Clear enough?

I've had my fill of any and all games with the word "Mario" and "Zelda" in the title. If that's supposed to continue to draw me in until the end of time, then they need a new marketing director. I want something new, fresh and exciting. Rehashing the same old shit just isn't going to fly.

@punchy71: EQ1 is definitely sandbox. EQ2 is hard to categorize into either category definitively (IMO), but it's certainly a lot closer to being theme park than EQ1, but I'd still give it a nod to being more sandboxy. :P

This is annoying for sure. Please either delete his garbage or provide some way to block/ignore this user so people don't have to wade through his crap.

If kids want to see sex on their computers, there's a massive amount of free porn plastered all over the internet. But we mustn't have bare boobs and innuendos in rated M video games. That would be just horrible. /sarcasm off

I generally make a female character, unless they are under-sexualized, in which case I go for male.

I rest my case.

I got this when it came out. Played probably half way through or a little more then lost interest. A very forgettable experience. Not terrible, just blah.

When you put 20 or 30 hours into a game and get very little actual enjoyment from it, why would any sane person go back and play it again on the off chance that it's "better now"? At best, I'd say it sucks less now, but sucking less and being good aren't the same thing.