raptortank4's forum posts

Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts
no
Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts

guys dont worry about the gears 2 spoiler. he technically isnt right. he doesnt find her dead. he finds her, but something else happens entirely. retard who spoiled a spoiler got the spoiler wrong....

cod4 comes right off the bat for making you yell. on veteran.

Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts
[QUOTE="sammyt555"]lol, they are both mediocre at best. as single player shooters, both had totally weak campaigns. Neither of them offered an experience worth mentioning. On lve, i dont know why you would play either when you could play CoD. this is my opinion anyway :)Nocturnal15
COD is weaker than Halo. Halo's campaign was terrible. However as far as multiplayer goes, it has been destroying everything ever since its release. Neither COD4 nor LOL Gears 2 cranked out daily numbers that halo 3 puts out. Hell even to this day Halo 3 has an avg of 200-300k people online at peak hours. In social slayer alone which mostly has anywhere between 50-100k beats the total amount of people on at a time in Gear and COD4 combined. Everytime I played COD4 I only saw about 50k-80k people online in multiplayer (and this was in dec 07-june08). Sure as hell today I bet its hardly pushing 20k. Gear 2....please dont make me laugh. That game is one of the most poorly made shooters out there. These forums will be deemed illogical if any of you think otherwise. Same old game breaking bullet lag from the first as well as the same old glitches to be taken advantage of in order to win. People played that game for the first week and now Its rare to see more than 10 out of the 80 people on my list play it. I honestly dont adore halo but its the most playable game out of the group (Gears, CoD, etc etc). It is also the one shooter today that I always go back to. Ive given away COD4 and Im borderline near snapping my Gears 2 disc in half with all the lag and glitches.

past the horrific lag and the ridiculous glitches, gears of war 2 has the basis for a great game. in the matches im able to get into with no lag and no serious glitchers, i can really enjoy it. there are some minor glitches that are really easy to do that are pretty commonly used. even i use them. weapon slide for one :P but ive rarely come across an of the serious ones like the KFF or crab walking. you really have to practice those and in a multiplayer match its usually impractical to do them unless you're lucky with having the right situation to pull it off.
Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts

gears of war 2

when the locust started fighting each other in their own civil war.

Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts
lol, they are both mediocre at best. as single player shooters, both had totally weak campaigns. Neither of them offered an experience worth mentioning. On lve, i dont know why you would play either when you could play CoD. this is my opinion anyway :)sammyt555
your opinion is absolute crap. this is my opinion anyway :) both are good games.
Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts
well yesterday my glitched shotgun shield was glitched I wouldnt work and the bullets went though my shield raylewisnfl52
wait, so ur complaining about a glitchy game yet youre using the glitches? wow... .... hypocrite.
Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts
Ya, I agree with the op. It got very repetitive and it took only my first hour of play to realize it. Somewhat ironic since its made by the same company that made Assassin's Creed - which was also very repetitive. Hmmmm....
Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts

theres no way in hell they'll give you thirty five dollars for a trade in game. they rip you off for your games. the only way you would get close to that is if you were to have a membership where you get additional percentages for trade in values, do it doing their turn in pair = plus $10, or something of the sort

 

the majority of the time you're better off trying to sell it off ebay or gamecrazy. gamecrazy is slightly better than gamestop for the most part 

Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts
GoW2
Avatar image for raptortank4
raptortank4

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 raptortank4
Member since 2008 • 152 Posts
[QUOTE="darkghost75"]

people who happened to find the game early in a store shouldn't get banned.

Shinoadr

Yes, yes they should.

 

No, no they shouldn't.