oooh cross-game voice chat...who cares! I don't play a game to talk to other people not in my game. If I want to play a hardcore game like kz2 I am talking with the people on my squad, not some fool playing bejewled. Straight up lems pay all this money for corss game chat, yet they get advertisments everywhere, avatars cost money, peer to peer games instead of dedicated, no online only games like warhawk or socom. an ugly interface with an ugly dell looking box, no blue-ray, no web browser, no standard hard -drvie, no standard wifi, no blue-tooth, no folding at home global new service, and the list goes on..... The only things the xbox has the ps3 doesn't is cross game chat, and racial slurs and kids screaming over their mics. .... plus pay to play online and advertisements. You would think if you have to pay to play online it would be ad free.... not with greedy ms. PSN is the better place, and I have used xblive over at a few friends houses, I can't stand it. Give me the simple intuitive elegance that is xmb on psn!It's not only cross game voice. There's cross game invites, and things. XBL is a completely integrated persistant experience that all interconnects, and all features are supported across the entire library and system usage as a whole. PSN feels like a bunch of separate apps that may or not not tell each other what is going on. XBL is seamless, while PSN feels very disjointed. It seems as if PSN is a rougher and more rudimentary version of XBL. It may do most or even close to all of what XBL does, but it doesn't do it as well. I think this is why cows focus strictly on feature bullet points and never the quality of the implimentationof the features.[QUOTE="world69star69"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Take out the first sentance, choose a different thread title and you would actually have a good point. Firstly it doesn't have cross game voice chat, invites, a movie store in the EU or quick firmware updates. Which XBL has.Steppy_76
XBL=DVR PS3=VCR.
i agree with this
Log in to comment