[QUOTE="hayato_"]
http://kotaku.com/5898947/xenoblade-chronicles-the-kotaku-review
Although it is Kotaku, I read the review (which the reviewer states you should still buy the game) which offered a more objective look at the game then all the other reviewers I've read so far. I don't believe that an "open" world or "tons" a quest merit a "revolution" that so many reviewers are calling this game for the genre, nor the best. The game's design looks very archaic imo as well, but just very well implemented (Due to Takahashi of course). That being said I believe the game will be very solid and I'm purchasing the game due mostly to the fact that the OST is so damn good (I love Yoko Shimomura's tracks).
My short conclusion: Very well made game. Not the design that future RPGs should follow imo.
Side note: He won it for me when I too found the similarity from Chu Chu (Xenogears) to Riki lol. Oh Takahashi
Also who else who hasn't played the game yet is buying??? Oh and for System Wars sakes to make this thread relevant. It should have been on the PS3/360/PC *runs*
Note: I know Monolith is owned by Nintendo as well. Just adding fuel lol
Another48hours
It is considered a revolution for being released in a pile of crap (Bad Jrpgs) and being rated from that instead of the game. The game is atrocious on so many levels, it IS generic, questionable characters, restrictions, a closed battle system not offering much variety, questionable characters, and cliches out the azz and more. It may not be super trash, but revolution probably has to do with the fact:1. Nintendo
2. The vast amountsof games selling well with the exception of things like Skyrim and etc, are shooters.
3. Jrgs or in decline on consoles and handhelds.
4. The reviewers use different standrads.
5. The reviewers are on some powerful stuff.
don't no wat game your talking about but it isn't Xenoblade
Log in to comment