This objectively is not the reason for the delays. I posted the reason. I literally linked it. The judge was having issues due to the nature of the classifications. You made this sentence up, it's entirely fictional. Dude why do you have to lie so often 🤣.

The other delay was due to two people banging, again nothing on the merit of the case. The 3rd delay is due to Trump having so many trials and them not finding room in the schedule.

For 3 of these trials the evidence is extraordinary. One would have to be in a cult to believe otherwise. Text, videos, audio. Are you saying there was no fake electors? Are you saying they didn't move the documents to hide them from the FBI? lol?

Yeah basically.

The case was delayed because the Trump selected judge couldn't handle it.

Judge Cannon Postpones Trump Case Citing Backlog Of Motions She Failed To Rule On - Above the Law

The extreme evidence remains. Trump would lose this case if it stops being delayed through sleazy tactics. He did exactly what they said he did.

A few of the boxes had the smaller documents, such as index cards, reorganized. This is because they shuffled around while moving the boxes. This is the king of nothing burgers and doesn't really matter.

Prosecutors: Docs in boxes seized from Mar-a-Lago were inadvertently jumbled - POLITICO

Trump still hid the documents from the FBI and refused to return them. This is a fact shown by video, text, and audio evidence. He's caught dead to rights on this, if corruption stops delaying the trial.

Timeline: Special counsel's investigation into Trump's handling of classified documents - ABC News

Even as weak as it is, he's currently losing on the facts via evidence on this case too.

Two consenting adults working together deciding to bone hardly effects the evidence of a fact driven case.

Inside the meeting of Republican electors who sought to thwart Biden’s Georgia win | AP News

Georgia election racketeering prosecution - Wikipedia

He did what they said he did lol.

You forgot the fourth one by the way,

Timeline: Special counsel's probe into Trump's efforts to overturn 2020 election - ABC News (go.com)

Yes. If Biden tries to install fake electors in 6 States he should be indicted and tried. And then go to prison IMO.

State the specific crimes and cite the evidence. The citation must be from reputable sources, thank you.

Biden should place his own slate of electors in 6 swing States, and try to have Kamala certify those instead!

As expected,

Trump classified documents trial in Florida postponed indefinitely (cnbc.com)

But the new ruling from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon vacates that date and sets a new slate of pretrial proceedings, the latest of which is a hearing set for July 22.

"In her ruling Tuesday, Cannon said there are many complicated legal rules and deadlines surrounding the use of classified evidence in public criminal trials that need to be considered before she picks a new court date."

LOL. This was a surefire win, the evidence for this specific case is extraordinary. But it seems like Canon will keep delaying it with reasons that keep perplexing legal experts.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals might have to deal with this, it's pretty egregious.

You would have a point if the evidence wasn't so monumental. And if the DOJ didn't refuse one of these cases.

TDS goes both ways, your posts appear to be extremely cult like. Weird stuff.

@sargentdsaid:

desperatley trying to keep Trump from becomming president again,

False. These trials are due to Trump's actions. Trump has received special treatment so far, you are I would be in jail for saying similar things about a Judge overseeing our trials.

@sargentdsaid:

no matter how illegal or unconstitutional, on the premise of political payback.

False. Nothing so far has been illegal or unconstitutional.

Your posts are highly fictional, as usual. Please start citing your claims. You lie very often. Just like your cult leader.

The millisecond there was a mountain of evidence and a jury of his peers (in some cases), it stopped being political persecution and lawfare. This is the equivalent of calling Nixon's persecution political. He's losing on the facts and merits.

How about you get mad at Trump for putting himself in this position rather than getting mad at US Law? Just don't rape someone (confirmed in court via federal judge), defame that person regarding the rape (confirmed in court via federal judge), commit fraud(confirmed in court), bang porn stars while your wife is pregnant and violate campaign finance laws in an attempt to silence them, hide classified documents so the FBI can't get them back and then lie to the FBI (this confirmed on VIDEO, testimony, text, and e-mail lol), and try to steal an election with fake electors in 6 states (confirmed via testimony, text, and e-mail).

So easy. Don't do these things lol.

Yeah it's nonsense. The problem is there is no proof of any of the countless allegations he and his cult make on social media. Unlike Trump's indictments.

There is a clear difference here. If any other politician had this much evidence of this many crimes I don't care what side they are on or who is bringing the charges, do it.

In fact we have seen indictments recently with two corrupt (D) Senators and even Hunter Biden, and I don't many if any leftists crying "Witch Hunt!". Why can't the right act like that?

If Trump has mountains of evidence of a crime against these people, sure. Let him go an "eye for an eye" in this instance. Lets see the indictments and trial with a jury of their peers. But If he doesn't have evidence and it's just Q-Anon lunacy, which I suspect is the case, then such attempts will probably fail. You can't get a criminal conviction from a jury because Trump tweeted it so. There has to be real evidence of a crime, which does not include Alex Jones yelling like a mad man.

Almost all of Trump's criminal indictments, and the three civil trials he lost, have substantial evidence. At times video, text, and e-mail. Unquestionably doing what the indictments claim he is doing.

But lets go further into this. Who do you think he should go after, for what crime, and what is the evidence so far? Provide valid citation from a reputable source.