rock_steady_bla's forum posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"] i think he's the_core_gameralextherussianCould be Jake trying on a new persona.... i heard those guys were legends around here.
Not to mention you forgot to mention, Kevin-V, that the "thresher maul" encounters of the game were quite rare. Since, ya'know, you complained about the thresher maul. :)
this is true. I only saw like 2 or 3 the whole game and i got that thar completionist achievement so i must've explored durned well the game could have used that time, idea, or enemy or whatever to create something really enjoyable, even if its juts 2 or 3 times, this one didnt, and instead it gave a feeling of not such greatness. stuff like this is what a review is about.moments in that like games, can be completely opposite. its those rare moments that sometimes make or break the experience for you, and they are worth mentioning.Not to mention you forgot to mention, Kevin-V, that the "thresher maul" encounters of the game were quite rare. Since, ya'know, you complained about the thresher maul. :)
Stevo_the_gamer
There's a story behind that Mass Effect thing. For the record, the disputed sentence was meant to communicate that even when you can move the targeting reticle up or down, the Mako may not be able to hit the target. You can target an enemy when you're at a higher elevation but not hit it, because the Mako's turret may not allow it, though the placement of your reticle implies that you can.
The sentence in the review is a poor one; I've often wished I could replace it, but an edit--and an editor's note--seem pointless all this time later. I've taken a Roger Ebert-type stance: let my mistake persist as a reminder to myself that I am fallible. For the record, I am very aware that the Mako's turret moves up and down, but for whatever reason, my sentence doesn't communicate what I intended. Alas, all I can do is go with it and learn from it. Of course, in a world of insane fanboys, one sentence can invalidate an entire career of great and honest work. Such is the world of the console wars.
as long as you keep it real your work should do the talking for itself. so far so good and a reason why many join and trust this site.after i saw your pics i dont think anyone would want to be your friend :PDepending on what Kevin V offers as a... friendship offering, I'll consider my vote ;) 8)
AdobeArtist
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
you wont be bothered much only on certain major issues that need resolving, for instance, wouldnt you say MLB The Show 09 is exclusive to the PS3 because the last gen versions just dont cut it? we need to know this so we can put it on the spreadsheet for PS3 exclusives in yellow ink.you wont be bothered much only on certain major issues that need resolving, for instance, wouldnt you say MLB The Show 09 is exclusive to the PS3 because the last gen versions just dont cut it?I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
I know! Finally someone else admits it! :P AC > ME.
Log in to comment