[QUOTE="Disturbed123"]joke thread?b-lane
suprisingly no but im havin a real hard time deciding which game i want because both seem good
i dont think anyone who has to make a decision like that should be allowed to be gaming.:P.....:?[QUOTE="Disturbed123"]joke thread?b-lane
suprisingly no but im havin a real hard time deciding which game i want because both seem good
i dont think anyone who has to make a decision like that should be allowed to be gaming.:P.....:?Ever since coming to college (halfway through my Spring term of Freshman year) I have played very few single player action/rpg/strategy games. Mostly Mario Kart, Smash Bros, Halo 3, etc; the social and party games. But recently I have been making an effort to get back into single player gaming with a vengeance. Only to find I really don't find them all that appealing anymore. And now I know why!
Thanks, Gamespot. Thanks for in your review writing the following under "Negative" for a game which recieved a 9.0 (GRRRREAT!)
Forgettable story and characters
Really. REALLY. You're going to give a game a NINE... despite it having a forgettable story and unremarkable characters. Thats like me giving Valkyrie with Tom Cruise four stars. Here's Rotten Tomatoes' summary of that movie, "Given the subject matter, Valkyrie could have been an outstanding historical thriller, but settles for being a mildly entertaining, but disposable yarn." Sounds almost like it had... FORGETTABLE STORY AND CHARACTERS.
Oh but its at a 60%. Because you see, I as a gamer am not in it for the thrill of killing nameless foes. I am not in it for shooting cool guns. I am not in it for playing as a cool looking character.
I play games to CARE about the people I play as. To hate the people I must kill. To connect, as I would in a movie, but to take it that extra step. To be able to act on what the story and characters make me feel.
Not just to be able to act at all.
And so I've realized that all these years when I was claiming that games should be seen on the same level as film in terms of artistic value... they still SHOULD be. But they never will be, because apparently not even Gamespot seems to think that emotion is an important enough characteristic in a game to bring it below AAA status when lacking. And of course the people MAKING the games won't value that, because as long as Gamespot supports them hiring more texture-shaders and bump-mappers and firing writers and artists, and the 5 million people who will buy this game support the companies behind it, no one sends that message.
Oh. And if you liked Valkyrie? Then enjoy Killzone 2. Sounds like it'll be right up your alley.
Graedien
says a lot more about you to quit one of your favorite hobbies(from the way you talk it sounds like) based on a review you disagree with
Not on the 360. I think you're looking for the PS2.[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="hopesfall2own"] Where are the jrpgs over 8.5 located then?BioShockOwnz
Cows still grasping onto the last generation. PS3 am cry, confirmed!
Cows need to get a 360 and DS, because it's obvious that FPS's aren't nearly enough for them.
lol, i dont see how you got ps3 praise out of that or 360 bashing. its just a fact.[QUOTE="whatisazerg"][QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]The SRPG fan in me will never see Valkyria Chronicles as a JRPG. It is a SRPG *crossed arms*, JRPGs and SRPGs are not the same thing.
jasonharris48
wrong... a JRPG can also be a SRPG.... J = Japanese, so if its developed in the land of the rising sun, and its an RPG, then guess what..... yup, its a JRPG.
I was going to say the same thing sir you beat me to it LOL actually i beat both of you :P[QUOTE="WhySoSerious300"][QUOTE="TheOwnerOner"]Awesome game, Too bad the D3 sucks ass for shooters....TheOwnerOner
No it doesnt. It's just you that stinks with it ;)
Im actually alright, about 1.2 kill to death ration, Thats prob because the PSN community are total newbs at shooters. i really dont get why people feel a need to make such blatant fanboyish lies.[QUOTE="ExplosiveChorro"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"] The online launched on I think the 24th. I spent the past 4 days in the field, not much playtime I can get in the field, now is there? You fanboys are dense, stupid, delusional, and shallow. Less depth than a parking lot puddle. Creatures that need to be watered twice a day. I feel sorry for you, honestly.usmcjdk6
Right back to yah..
And, per usual - victory is mine. :lol: i just love hypocrisy dont you?[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]halo 3-2007 kz2-2009 times have changed, i doubt halo 3 would be given that same score today. also, geow 2 had a 9, same as kz2, hence, ps3 has spawned something to even come close to toppling 360-borne shooters. additionaly, many gamers, as seen on these boards, would say kz2 is better than halo 3. its still opinion, but you try to pass it off as fact. sorry, i dont see any pudding, let alone any proof in it. I know. 4 years development time, 2 years on top of Halo, and it still can't top it. What a sad case of events. Still waiting for VanCow to tell me why he omits important things from his PS3 reviews.hate to do this but...
Halo 3, 9.5. Killzone 2, 9.0. Need I say more. How can I lie when the proof is RIGHT THERE IN THE PUDDING.
usmcjdk6
i know, a sequel to a complete flop, bellow A status, ridiculed by everyone, and it receives the same score as geow2, sequal to a 9.5 game titled goty. what a sad case of events. and just because it came out two years later does not mean it did not top halo3, which is the only reason why it has a higher score.
ready to stop whenever you are;)
[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]Because I waited to give the online a chance. The online failed.
And it's 12 at night
Want to work that into your little noodle there boy?
usmcjdk6
but according to you you've had it for 2 weeks.
You aren't a smart one are you? am i not smart for assuming that any normal person can finish a short campaign and play some mp within 14 days at least? or am i not smart for having completely demolished every single one of your arguments and making you vulnurable. or is it just that you cannot think of any more excuses to cover up your trolling, so you instead try to attack me to try to cover it up and avoid it."But no one will be playing this game at the end of next month" that is a lie. "The game is good. Ball stops there. It's nothing special. If for whatever reason you need some historic FPS ammo to hold against the 360, I'm sorry but the PS3 hasn't spawned anything to even come close to toppling 360-borne shooters" this is a lie, because you are passing it off as a fact, in which case it has been proven wrong by gamers and critics alike.[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"] Why would I lie about a product I bought? FOR $60 IT SUCKS. Deal with it. It's a return with a maybe buy in 2 years. But no one will be playing this game at the end of next month, much less two years from now. Heavenly Sword, Chapter 3. What a wonderful game.usmcjdk6
hate to do this but...
Halo 3, 9.5. Killzone 2, 9.0. Need I say more. How can I lie when the proof is RIGHT THERE IN THE PUDDING.
halo 3-2007 kz2-2009 times have changed, i doubt halo 3 would be given that same score today. also, geow 2 had a 9, same as kz2, hence, ps3 has spawned something to even come close to toppling 360-borne shooters. additionaly, many gamers, as seen on these boards, would say kz2 is better than halo 3. its still opinion, but you try to pass it off as fact. sorry, i dont see any pudding, let alone any proof in it.
Log in to comment