It's not supposed to have stereoscopic 3D support. Why in the f*cking f*ck would it have stereoscopic 3D support?charizard1605

Gee it's called Super Mario 3D World, and is a remix/port of the 3DS game whose gameplay was designed entirely around stereoscopic 3D. Nintendo now has stripped that core feature out and tack on a 60 dollar price tag. 

What a joke. Even ps3/360 have stereoscopic 3D games, and those are much more graphic intensive games. Might as well play Super Mario 3D Land on the Nintendo 2DS (or 3DS with 3D disabled) considering that this is just a remix/up-port of the 3ds game. The nerve that Nintendo actually believe this will be their system seller when the $60 port of DS/Wii's new super mario bros and GC's Zelda Wind Waker failed so far. 

Wow at those claymation look under some lighting conditions; absolutely atrocious. And to think Nintendo once again have the nerve to charge $50 for this botched up port of a decade old game

This is funny since this was announced as Wii U exclusive and it got a whole point lower than the later announced versions lol

finalstar2007

https://twitter.com/BobSummerwill

Another engineer with insider knowlege comes out of the woodshack and confirms the obvious. Will Nintendo fanboys still be in denial about this? $350 console that is less powerful than than the $200 ones that was released back in 2006. And enough about how the controller makes up most of the expense; the controller has been reverse engineered and exposed as a cheap item that is well beneath junk $100 tablets.