rush2428's forum posts

Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

lmao:)

Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

I can give you one. Go find yourself three cheap crt monitors on Craigslist. then go spend about 700.00 bucks or less on a solid rig and play games on

triple screens at high res. I am 40 years old. I got an Atari 2600 on launch day and have gamed ever since. I enjoy console gaming but nothing compares

to PC gaming..........NOTHING!!!!!

Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

http://fear.filefront.com/file/FEAR_Resurrection_Interval_1_amp_2_;117398

If you have not played this go get it right now and get knee deep into some F.E.A.R..

I have been playing this in triple crt setup @ 4800x1200@100hz and it just rocks to no end. Updated graphics, lighting, particle effects, AI.......everything that makes you love

F.E.A.R. is improved upon. The level design is outstanding and the story....oh my gosh...the story.....

Go get it now!!!!! Alma's waiting.......

Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

OK. Sorry about the wait but I'm going to be uploading the videos in the next day or so. I am pretty happy with the setup and it's performance. I think after you see the video that Softth and a three crt setup is actually pretty sweet!:)

Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

Why use a CRT these days? LCDs look heaps better in my eyes.....take up less space and even help the environment using less energy I hear....FelipeInside

Well without going into the old LCD vs. CRT argument let me just say why I personally am doing it.

1. FREE!!!!! I was able to obtain my crt setup at no cost.

2. I am able to run all three screens up to 2048x1536@80hz. An equivalent lcd would run me how much?

I personally feel the image quality exceeds anything else I've used. I know there are better LCD out there, but I can't justify

paying what would be at least a few hundred per screen for what may be close to what I have for free.

3. Heat is not a concern as my room stays cool.

4. Power would be a concern if I gamed all day long but I use my tubes about 1-2 hours per day.

Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

I just want to nip this in the bud before it gets started. BEZELS ARE NOT AN ISSUE! I have been playing for the last couple hours and the bezels melt away after a few minutes of playing. Quite honestly, this was my biggest concern and it's been negated after just a few minutes. The "bezels" myth is just a myth. It does not interfere at all with my own personal gaming enjoyment. I know for some it may always be an issue, but for me it is no longer.

Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

I am posting a video and pics soon for those who may ask. I'm spending the coming days playing the following games using SoftTH and 3 crt monitors. The goal for me is to determine the viability of using three crt monitors for everyday gaming use. I only game about 1-2 hours a day so power usage is not a big deal to me. Temps will be concern in my game room, but AC is set to 75fh. I am also trying to stay away from SLI CFX, NVSurround or Eyefinity if I don't need to use them. If I can play my favorite games with SoftTH then why bother with anything else? Lastly, to help those others who have always wanted to go three screens, but want to do it on the cheap with CRT monitors. The nice thing about crt monitors is the 4:3 aspect ratio. There's no stretching of the image on the side monitors so everything looks even.

The monitors:

2 HP P1130 21" CRT monitors

1Dell P1130 21" CRT monitors

All the monitors are calibrated and in excellent condition with max res of 2048x1536@80hz

The system specs:

Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit

Core 2 Quad q9650@ 3.6ghz

EVGA GTX 570@ stock, Galaxy GTS 250@ 820c 2000s 1250m for primary rendering, plus an 8800gt@ stock for side disp

lay

6gigs Corsair RAM@ 800mhz

Seagate SATA HD 1TB 10600prm

Corasair 700W PSU with 75A on thee 12v rails

The crt's will be run at 1024x768@100hz for total res of 3092x768@100hz

and 1600x1200@100hz total res 4800x1200, and 2048x1536@80hz for total res of 6144x1536@80hz

The games:

Call of Duty 2

Call of Duty MW

Call of Duty MW2

Call of Duty WAW

Call of Duty BO

Medal of Honor 2010

Serious Sam TFE HD

Serious Sam TSE HD

If anybody has a game they'd like me to try let me know.

Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts
In some games meaning about 10% of those currently available.......not a good reason to get the guy thinking his cpu is not up to the task of feeding his GTX 460.
Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts
Agreed, but for 90% of the games out there he will be fine, even at 2.4ghz.. Let's just stay away from making blanket statements that a 2.4ghz C2Q is " Not good for gaming."
Avatar image for rush2428
rush2428

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 rush2428
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

Despite it being a quad-core, 2.4ghz is too low for gaming. The employee is right. I recommend 3.4 ghz. Anything more than that isn't really worth the overclock. I'm going by my own overclock tests I've done on two of my rigs since 2008. It is bottle-necking your GPU. Unless you mean to say 3.4 in the first place? I'm confused by the responses above...

I'd like to add that very few games utilize the quad-core. The only game that comes to mind is GTA IV. Even then, I dont know of a game yet that "truly" utilizes quad-cores.

Elann2008
Your statement that 2.4ghz is too low for gaming is what set me off. That's just dumb...period! A C2Q @ 2.4ghz is just right for his GTX 460. Your statement makes it sound like he's totally mixmatched with that pairing unless he gets it up to 3.4ghz. I don't dispute that if he gets it up to at least 3.0ghz, that he will see some improvement, but even then it won't be that much, especially at 1920x1080.