samam005's forum posts

Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts
[QUOTE="Grinning_Demon"][QUOTE="samam005"]

LOL Nub this is obviously your first gen, but before the PSX, all games were played on cartriges, N64, NES, SNES, all of them. . .

surrealnumber5

hahaha

okay i'm gonna be nice and just point out that a little something called Sega Saturn came out first. And i'm ignoring less popular stuff like the Panasonic or Sega CD.

lol he thought the ps1 was the first cd system these cows dont know past their noes

the PSX was the first POPULAR console which used discs, and was responsible for making it mainstream. . .:roll:

Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts
[QUOTE="samam005"]

:lol: One of the first nintendo fanboys ive seen trying to make the PS3 look bad. . .i would never pay 250 dollars for a wii, which in my opinion is a Ps2 plus motion sensors, Most games dont even use motion sensors. Also the PSX did the most for gaming, it was the system that changed games from cartridges to discs, and that my friend is BIG. And your upcoming FPS, is just a ps2 quality game

PS. the Wii had 1 good game this year, the 360 about 5, and the PS3 had about 6

Grinning_Demon

PSX changed games from cartridges to cd's? LOLWUT???

LOL Nub this is obviously your first gen, but before the PSX, all games were played on cartriges, N64, NES, SNES, all of them. . .

Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts

:lol: One of the first nintendo fanboys ive seen trying to make the PS3 look bad. . .i would never pay 250 dollars for a wii, which in my opinion is a Ps2 plus motion sensors, Most games dont even use motion sensors. Also the PSX did the most for gaming, it was the system that changed games from cartridges to discs, and that my friend is BIG. And your upcoming FPS, is just a ps2 quality game

PS. the Wii had 1 good game this year, the 360 about 5, and the PS3 had about 6

Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts

[QUOTE="king_bobo"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]If they decide to go multiplat instead of console exclusive with a failure like the ps3.Gh0st_Of_0nyx

I'm sorry but I can't understand what you're trying to say. Are you saying if they went exclusive it would fail like (in your opinion) the PS3? If that's what you are saying, I'm afraid I don't agree in two ways - 1) Both consoles have a large user base, so it should sell well on either console (it may even help sell more of that console, and so that's why it would be possible that either Microsoft or Sony would choose to buy it). 2) PS3 isn't a success in the same way as the PS2 was, but it certainly isn't a failure - PSN is a thriving community, Blu-Ray beat HD-DVD, PS3 exclusives are incredible and it continues to sell a great deal. If that's not what you're saying, could someone please explain (if they can) what they are saying...

1.It would sell BETTER on the 360 then on the ps3. Looks at Haze's sales then come back and say it would sell well on the ps3 :|

2. Ps3 is infact a failure, Lost exclusives, horrible software sales, horrible hardware sales (points out last months NPD numbers) and as you pointed out more people use it as a Blu ray player then a actual game machine :roll:

Im saying if FR stays afloat and goes multiplat then they have a chance of being the successful developer they were last gen with the timeplsitters series. But since they went exclusive with a failure like the ps3 it basically killed them because no one bought there game.

I cant wait until the end of this Gen, when sony overtakes M$

Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts

I'll never recognize a generic shooter as AAA material. Not as long as games that try to be different suffer in ratings and in sales because of them. Isn't that right Shadows of the Colossus?Symphonycometh

So true, im still waiting for the SofC sequel, but killzone 2 looks special

Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts
and this would be my first SOCOM game
Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts
thanks for all your replies, but im still on the fence
Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts
id like tactical, but SOCOM doesnt look that good. . .
Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts
bumpeth
Avatar image for samam005
samam005

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 samam005
Member since 2008 • 159 Posts
would you consider Warhawk superior in every way, because i kinda like tactical shooters, the slow and realsitic pace is cool to me, is SOCOM considered a tactical shooter?