[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

[QUOTE="MetalGearSolidZ"] Uncharted 1 looked better than Gears of WarMetalGearSolidZ

And GeOW2, but GeOW came out in 2006.

Looked better (lighting, shadowing, character models, everything :)), but the point is that in 2006 graphical console (and probably pc) king was Gears of War :)

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="teh_cell"]

Seems all the console graphics king games have been PS3 exclusives for ages now. If both are supposedly about equal in terms of power, why isn't it showing up in the graphics. All this rubbish about the 360 not having had any custom engines made for it, why not? The 360 is afterall backed by the largest software company in the world, a company with incredibly deep pockets. Why hasn't Microsoft funded the development of a game engine to be used by their first party developers that gets every ounce of of the console? The more likely explaination is that the 360 is just about tapped and their is little to be gained from such an undertaking. The 360 was easier to develop for and got maxed out pretty quickly.

MetalGearSolidZ

And GeOW2, but GeOW came out in 2006.

Halo, Forza and Fable have custom engines.

Posting facts = trolling?

FamiBox

"Facts" from IGN graphical experts? :roll:

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=16415

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-assassins-creed-ii-face-off-article

"Visually, both versions of Assassin's Creed II look virtually identical. Textures, shadows and anti-aliasing quality match very well."

"The winner of this assassination is the Xbox 360. Both versions were very close in every category except performance. Screen tearing is a major performance problem and we at the Lens of Truth, quite frankly, can't stand this. With the PlayStation 3 version having close to 3 times the amount, it was the only issue that prevented a tie"

"Let's deal with the basic rendering spec. Similar to the first Assassin's Creed, ACII runs at native 720p resolution, with 2x multi-sampling anti-aliasing on Xbox 360 and quincunx edge-smoothing on PS3. The net result is that the PS3 has fewer "jaggies" at the expense of every texture in the game getting an unwelcome blur."

"There's proper anisotropic filtering on both versions that looks identical and serves its purpose admirably. Some reports peg the 360 game as possessing superior texture filtering, but it's actually the same cross-platform, with just variations in implementation between the NVIDIA and ATI GPUs causing slight differences. The PS3 developers do appear to have had a bit more fun with their light-sources in night-time scenes, however. Viewpoint set-pieces at night clearly show the PS3 code to have more lights in effect."

IGN have no idea about technical aspects of graphics quality, if you want the truth look for lens of truth or digital foundry articles.

PS3 Global average FPS: 28.97, Global percent of torn frames: 16.36 X360 Global average FPS: 29.76, Global percent of torn frames: 5.06

XBOX360 is a graphic beast....8)

Panosola

Maybe in 2005 :P

And here are your "facts" about every multiplatform game looks and perform better on X360:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-17-article?page=4 TRU

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=10154

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=7006

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=9557

[QUOTE="punkrocker163"][QUOTE="Nidget"]The 360 version is the way to go. Its got more AA, colours look more rich and theres little screen tearing. The PS3 version is practically unplayable if you've experienced the superior 360 version.Panosola

I don't agree with you.I have play AC2 on PS3&360 but the 360 version is superior....more sharp graphics and smooth framerate.And it is a fact that all the Multiplat games look and play better on 360.

Multiplat games problems on PS3...:

1) Games running in Sub-HD.

2) Tons of Jaggies.

3) Games running in 30 Hz instead of at 60.

4) Awful texturing, aliasing, shading, shadowing,lighting.

5) Tons of Framerate drops.

6) Tons of Screen Tearing.

And all we can see that on AC2 PS3 version.

LOL?

Comparisons:

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/console-comparison-assassins-creed/59368

http://www.videogameszone.de/aid,699613/Assassins-Creed-2-Grafikvergleich-PS3-vs-Xbox-360-Unterschiede-in-Texturen-und-Kamera/Special/?menu=browser&mode=article&article_id=699613&entity_id=219434,219433&image_id=1222435&page=1&order=

PS3 version have better anti alliasing (QAAx2, Xbox have MSAAx2, QAAx2 smooth edges like MSAAx4) and more light sources at night.

[QUOTE="Sollet"]LOL yeah ok comparing a port not even made by SEGA with BioWARE who is more used to 360 than PS3. I think you lose on this one lemming.The_RedLion

Single one?

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-17-article?page=4 TRU

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=10154

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=7006

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=9557