lol gummiracoon go away. graphics cards cant bottleneck anything. if you have a crappy graphics card you get crappy performance but its not a "bottleneck" as nothing is being bottlenecked, its just a crappy graphics card.[QUOTE="seercirra"]
[QUOTE="ZombieAkane"]
I was just thinking, making a Radeon 6850 with 2gb of GDDR5 is a bottleneck isn't it?
Or a GTX 550-ti with a 192 memory bus.
I'm not sure I am asking you. So don't get mad.
My way of seeing it, is that a 6850 can't utilize 2gb of Vram properly just like a GTX 550-ti can't take full advantage of a 192 bit memory bus.
So, a 2gb 6950 is much more capable of utilizing that 2gb. Therefor more balanced = less bottleneck?
retrogamer1971
After some thought about various scenarios I will add this:
I like to think of the gpu as the end of the pipeline before what you see is displayed on your monitor. In the case of a top of the line rig with a weak gpu, you have a very wide pipeline that allows lots of data flow, but once you get to the weak gpu the pipeline thins out and restricts how much you will see (fps) on your monitor at any given time. Now, if you go and buy a more powerful gpu, the pipeline gets bigger and allows more data to flow to your monitor. I'd argue that the gpu in this case is acting as a bottleneck, as the system itself is capable of producing more fps but is hampered by the gpu.
but there is such a thing as a definition, and a gpu cannot by definition be a bottleneck. you get crap performance with a crap GPU, its that simple. the monitor will display what ever you give it. or are you gonna tell me that your graphics card bottlenecks your monitor?? its like saying, if you are trying to play a an mp3 on a cd player that your cd player bottlenecks your MP3. no it doesnt, you just cant play mp3's on a cd player. like you cant have the best graphics on a crappy gpu. do you not think its obvious to people if they buy a £10 gpu that it wont be good in games?? why complicate that for noobs but telling them its a "bottleneck"? there is a reason things are defined as they are. philosophize all you like but do it on a philosophy forum. not a technical help forum.
heres a scenario. what if i had NO gpu?? what if i just used crappy onboard graphics? would you then tell me that my system was bottlenecked by an ABSENCE of a peice of hardware? you would tell me my system was bottlenecked by thin air? now you see how ludicrous you sound. if you want to tell me my system is bottlenecked by having no graphics card, i would ask what WHAT is it bottlenecking? everything in your pc already fulfills its duty with or without a graphics card. a cpu in a game will do everything it can to play the game. if it cant then its because it lacks a function or simply isnt powerful enough. adding a graphics card provides you with the function and power, but nothing was bottlenecked before.
Log in to comment