Roche, Lambert...but in that list, Ciri. And then Triss

Kart. I don't recall a single Kart entry that was not enjoyable.

Very big deal for me. I'm not into games looking realistic and pretty, i just need them to be decently rendered and perform well too. Framerate is more important, especially when it comes to consoles and their limitations. I can deal with stable 30 but below makes the experience painful at times.

To me it's about expectations. If a game releases on consoles then I always tell myself to be prepared for the compromise in visual fidelity. If it's on PC then there is no excuse to cap anything. (Looking at you Arkham Knight.)

I bought Shovel Knight on Steam, and then on 3DS. Game's just so good.

I don't think the differences were that big last gen, (definitely bigger than this gen's almost minute difference) but I get what you're saying.

However my point was, to say that xbox one owners only care about their games is overgeneralizing, and I'm pretty sure you'd do the same if your preferred console has better performance. The reason I brought up last gen was that PS3 owners said exactly the same thing, which was "we only care about our games" (and sometimes you get the idiots overhyping teh CELL) about the multiplat performances, regardless of the gap in the framerates and resolutions back then.

Nah. Whoever gets the console with the advantage will gloat, and the the party with the weaker console will probably resort to, "hey, we only care about the games."

I've seen it happen way too many times last gen with PS3 owners defending their beloved ps3 consoles performing abysmally in multiplats here on this board.

@Cloud_imperium: Goodness I forgot about all about Ubersampling when I first played Witcher 2. Will reinstall to enable it, now that I have a better hardware today to see the difference.

Spider-Man 2 on the Xbox, (played it on PS2, graphics not as crisp, but still amazing fun), Web of Shadows on consoles (I played the PC version, I only got it to run well last year after upgrading, so you can imagine how bad optimization was when it was first released.)

Also, Ultimate Spider-Man.

And to those saying the Batman games were better, well f**k me, of course they're better. Two of the games are classics and the last game was still a damn fine experience despite its flaws. But this thread never asked for comparisons between the two, so let's just stick to the Spider-Man suggestions all right.

No. It doesn't deserve to have a special treatment of getting a 100 dollars price tag just because it is such a long awaited title. 40 to 60 dollars.