He never did. That's actually a concoted concept created by those who attempted to add a paganistic twist to the religion, to better integrate it into roman society.

[QUOTE="shoeonhead82"]Wait... what? How can you suggest a homosexual can procreate. They can't, unless they do it outside of their relationship which is a moot point.Link256

Nevermind... my eyes are still waking up. I thought you said homosexuals not heterosexuals. L M A O

Anyways. Gay marriage is pointless, and is just a bastardization on the traditions of marriage. Why in the world can't they just call it a civil union and be done with it? Why must the demand be that it be called a "marriage"?

You are contracting your own rule. According to you, the ultimate goal of marriage is procreation, right? Not all heterosexual couples can or will procreation. Therefore, not all heterosexual couples should be able to get married. I am only following your own rules.

Otherwise, who said anything about calling homosexual marriage "traditional marriage"? I am just saying marriage.

Link256

Wait... what? How can you suggest a homosexual can procreate. They can't, unless they do it outside of thier relationship which is a moot point.

He never did. That's actually a concoted concept created by those who attempted to add a paganistic twist to the religion, to better integrate it into roman society.

This thread is to address the obvious bias found in publications.

The facts and logic are simple. Gaming publications are a form of media that thrive on their public. This is because it is inheriently the public that makes them money. The more people that frequent the site, the more they make.

That said, there will always be websites that will endulge in biased reviews in order to pull certain demographics in. Whether this means feeding the lems, feeding the cows, feeding the hermits, feeding the sheep... and yes, feeding the mantacore.

This is of course only the basics. Marketing skewing content can be much more complicated then just this.