@lostrib said:
@b4x said:
@lostrib said:
@b4x said:
@lostrib said:
Don't tag Gamespot
If half the game doesn't work (the MP half) then why shouldn't it be rated down? they rate the game that they have, not what it will be
No they rated the game down to shame the 1000's of people that worked on the game over that years. Over something that will be fixed.
Countering all of their original AAA scores.... All 4 of them for a game that cost 60 bucks. That's not honest.
Play it.... then 6 it.
They did play it, or at least tried to, and found it deserved a 6. Get over it.
I'm over it.. are all the 1000's of people that worked, to bring this collection over the years over it?
I'm just saying I couldn't do it. That's just me.
If they're upset about it then they can speak for themselves. They don't need you speculating about their feelings
Quit your bitching
I'm a member on this board.... I call bs when I see it. You know that by now. I'm usually right. I'm 100% right, right here.
How can you take the work of 1000's of people and shit on it over something that will be fixed?
He could have gave it a placeholder score... like most reviewers... until the issues are fixed. No he glass half emptied the game... over something that will be fixed.
There's nothing logical about that with the amount of content that is available in the game.
That is a pessimistic review .... that holds zero merit.
Especially after the content is fixed. Instead of going back later and amending the review if it wasn't fixed. He basically said they can't fix it with his score.
There is nothing honest about that...
Log in to comment