sins_n_shadows' forum posts

  • 14 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

What makes you good. Well take this "good person test" to see how you do.

Have you ever told a lie?

Have ever stolen something regardless of value?

Have you used God's Name in vain?

Jesus said,"whoever looks at a women to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart."

Have you ever looked with lust?

Yep these are only four of the ten Commandments. According to God's Law, are you a good person?

From this test you are a lying, thieving, blasphemer, adulterer at heart.

If (I say If because most of you don't believe in God) God were to judge you based on His Law, would you be innocent or guilty?

Would you go to Heaven or Hell? Well you might say,"If God is so forgiving, then he wont send me to Hell."

If you think that then you just broke God's second Commandment, You shall not make yourself any graven image. Which means don't make a god to fit your needs.

Think of it like this, A judge has to punish people who break the law. Since the judge is a good judge he cannot let any wicked person go free. The judge must punish the people who break the law. God is the perfect judge, He cannot let anyone with sin to enter the Kingdom of God.

Based on God's Law would you go to Heaven or Hell?

You have a conscience, which means "with knowledge." You have a basic understanding of right and wrong.

Well then how do you get to heaven?

"For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life." -John 3:16

Only through Jesus can you enter the Kingdom of God. Repent your sins, that is to turn from them and ask Jesus to come into your life. Trust in Jesus like you would trust in a parachute to save your life.

I care about you and don't want you in Hell. If you don't believe in God, why risk your life on it? Doesn't this concern you?

No matter how long you can manage to stay alive, you will be dead longer than that.

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"]I don't see how anyone can believe in evolution.rowzzr

i don't think people need to argue with a guy as blind as this one. and this is coming from a Catholic (me.)

Sorry I disagree with you but evolution is still around because there is no other way to explain how we got here, other than God did it but that would be against science right?

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"]

So you're saying that evolution happens so slow that no one can observe it?

Then wont you need faith to believe that the universe is 20 billion years old, the earth is 4.6 billion, and all the life forms today evolved from a rock 3 billion years ago?

Cerussite

No... Because science has something faith doesn't have. Proof.

Okay show some proof that non-living material can turn into living material.

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"]

If they can bring forth, then they are the same kind.

A horse and dog cannot bring forth, so they are not the same kind of animal.

Cerussite

A horse and a donkey can "bring forth". Or, in layman's terms, ****. They are clearly not the same kind of animal.

Your argument=void.

Um... a horse, donkey, zebra, mule, etc. are all the same kind of animal.

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"][QUOTE="olion"]

[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"]I don't see how anyone can believe in evolution.bman784

Perhaps you don't understand what it is. Basically it just means that organisms in a species with traits that give them a better chance at surviving end up passing them on and making them more dominant.

For example, lets pretend there is a species of lizard that has red skin. Through a mutation of some sort (through chemicals or other source), a lizard is born with green skin. The green skin lets it blend in with its surroundings better, allowing it to survive and reproduce, getting offspring with some having green some having red. The red are more easy to spot, so they are at higher risk of dying, while the green ones reproduce. Over time the red ones die out, and the lizard is now only green.

Other things could also happen, such as the mutation happening inside a lizard population on an island, keeping the green skin allele contained. This would result in two close islands having lizards of different colored skins. Darwin observed things like this, such as the famous finches, or turtles that all had different shells depending on what island you went to.

That's just a variation within its own kind, its not macro-evolution which is a lie.

Define macro-evolution, by your standard.

An example would be an animal producing an animal other than its kind.


Evolution is a gradual change over millions of years that involves small instances of circumstantial genetic variation. You've probably lived less than 20 years, so I'd say your perspective is a bit limited.

So you're saying that evolution happens so slow that no one can observe it?

Then wont you need faith to believe that the universe is 20 billion years old, the earth is 4.6 billion, and all the life forms today evolved from a rock 3 billion years ago?

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"][QUOTE="Cerussite"][QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"]

That's just a variation within its own kind, its not macro-evolution which is a lie.

notconspiracy

You have any evidence to back up that claim, Darwin?

Do you see any creature produce another kind of animal, other than its own?

Dogs still produce dogs, with many different variations but there still dogs.

define "dog" and what is the specific defintion of "kind"?

if you're going to use the biblical definition for "kind", then people certainly have observed animals and plants changing kinds. here's how.

God told noah to bring 2 of each kind of animal, "one and its mate" inplying that the animals can breed and produce offspring. Now, if 2 animals can produce offspring together, then they are a species. speciation is an observed and documented fact

If they can bring forth, then they are the same kind.

A horse and dog cannot bring forth, so they are not the same kind of animal.

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"][QUOTE="olion"]

[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"]I don't see how anyone can believe in evolution.CptJSparrow

Perhaps you don't understand what it is. Basically it just means that organisms in a species with traits that give them a better chance at surviving end up passing them on and making them more dominant.

For example, lets pretend there is a species of lizard that has red skin. Through a mutation of some sort (through chemicals or other source), a lizard is born with green skin. The green skin lets it blend in with its surroundings better, allowing it to survive and reproduce, getting offspring with some having green some having red. The red are more easy to spot, so they are at higher risk of dying, while the green ones reproduce. Over time the red ones die out, and the lizard is now only green.

Other things could also happen, such as the mutation happening inside a lizard population on an island, keeping the green skin allele contained. This would result in two close islands having lizards of different colored skins. Darwin observed things like this, such as the famous finches, or turtles that all had different shells depending on what island you went to.

That's just a variation within its own kind, its not macro-evolution which is a lie.

Define macro-evolution, by your standard.

An example would be an animal producing an animal other than its kind.

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"]

That's just a variation within its own kind, its not macro-evolution which is a lie.

Cerussite

You have any evidence to back up that claim, Darwin?

Do you see any creature produce another kind of animal, other than its own?

Dogs still produce dogs, with many different variations but there still dogs.

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="sins_n_shadows"]I don't see how anyone can believe in evolution.olion

Perhaps you don't understand what it is. Basically it just means that organisms in a species with traits that give them a better chance at surviving end up passing them on and making them more dominant.

For example, lets pretend there is a species of lizard that has red skin. Through a mutation of some sort (through chemicals or other source), a lizard is born with green skin. The green skin lets it blend in with its surroundings better, allowing it to survive and reproduce, getting offspring with some having green some having red. The red are more easy to spot, so they are at higher risk of dying, while the green ones reproduce. Over time the red ones die out, and the lizard is now only green.

Other things could also happen, such as the mutation happening inside a lizard population on an island, keeping the green skin allele contained. This would result in two close islands having lizards of different colored skins. Darwin observed things like this, such as the famous finches, or turtles that all had different shells depending on what island you went to.

That's just a variation within its own kind, its not macro-evolution which is a lie.

Avatar image for sins_n_shadows
sins_n_shadows

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 sins_n_shadows
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
I don't see how anyone can believe in evolution.
  • 14 results
  • 1
  • 2