smokerob79's comments

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cboye18: after having BF 4 for over a year i would have to say most maps are to BIG......when you play squad death match it makes most maps the right size for 64 players.....large conquest could support at least a 128 players if not 256 in most maps.......

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

yeah 64 players was done by unreal in what 2001??? what happened to making things bigger and better.....i want a 1000 people to one server like planetside 2.....make it a real war.....

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@superbuuman: im going to wait and i only have a 770 4gb.......i have a PS4 and running my PC at 1600x900 or even 1368x768 my PC still looks better then the consoles.....and that is playing the same game

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@regulas: i dont fell bad.....my 7 year old AMD 955 running 3.8ghz does just fine in fallout......even before the updates it never dropped below 40 frames with a 770 4gb, 8gb of 1600 on a 970 north bridge mother....after upgrading to win 10 its running almost 60 frames no matter where i am.......

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@slickwilly06: yeah i have seen a lot of bench marks showing the 1080 not getting over 40 frames in a bunch of games at 4k.......we still are not a point a single card run 4k at 60 frames....

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@wtf_damn: it would be funny if its only running 256......

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@fanirama: i have 7 year old parts in my PC and it still plays current games....side by side my PS4 does not look as good playing many games as my PC does and im running the PC at 1368x768 and the console is running 1080 at 30 frames.....my 500 dollar pile of used computer parts still out does PS4........right now i would put a 1070 on my 7 year old AMD 955 running at 3.8ghz just to see what it could do......after installing win 10 most games dont come close to maxing out my old CPU like they did running 7.......even if im looking to upgrade to a 4 year old 8350 for a CPU with the way programing is going and how 10 runs lots of people will be able to run these cards even with old core components.....

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@SolidSnakeJT: yeah no......my workstation has 2 12 core exons that were 2 grand EACH......im about to upgrade but the 3 780 ti 6gb and the tesla on top of that dont add up to 4 grand when i got them new.......the small workstations running now some what old 3930k all have 4gb 680 in them that were 80 dollars less then the CPU at the time of building.......the GPU is not always the most costly.....

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@chad28_69: never played any other way.....single card has always been the best option when so few games support crossfire or SLI......the sad fact is having a SLI or crossfire rigs can slow you down in some games VS having only card of the same make and model.....

Avatar image for smokerob79
smokerob79

1750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@fanirama: i have a runco 3d 1080p 300 inch projector that was 34 grand new( i got for 3 grand at a estate sale) and i never play anything or run even movies in 3d.......it gives me head aches...