There should never be a DLC that is released, as expensive as dlcs are these days, to a game with a single player component, without any added story content. Absolute utter tut
Why use the license with a story that doesnt fit into the actual movie considering the movie only shows us that 3 or so of the characters knew each other and worked with each other before the movie began. This will only hurt what sounds like an interesting indie shooter.
@tevic: Look, don't get me wrong, its certainly fun and even well written at time but its just too dated for me. Having said that, if I ever saw it for like £10 I'd pick it up (recently picked up wwe 2k16 for a fiver)
@monkyby87: You stated the criteria this site used. The game does not meet that criteria. That's not opinion, that is the basis of the review.
Anyway, 10/10 doesn't mean much and hasn't for 15 years or so. What matters mroe is the content of the reviews and they all seem to be positive so I think this is a very good, maybe veen great game. WOn't know till I play it though.
@monkyby87: Ok fair enough. But even by that definition, this shouldn't get a 10 considering it does nothing new. Yes it has elements that are new to the series (which is why I wana play it) but these elements are not new to open world games or games of a similar nature (survival, weapons degrading, the environment posing a physical challenge etc).
soul_starter's comments