XXXXXX

Forum Posts	Following	Followers
1569	40	4

spd39th

Follow

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 spd39th

Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts

[QUOTE="Maximus_xcv"][QUOTE="toment"]It's fake, everything is fake untill Nintendo has it on their release-schedule.

Can someone please give me an example of a situation where someone has 'leaked'
pictures and info on a game onto the internet (or magazines) and where the game wasn't fake, but actually was made for a system? -and I'm not talking about the present, this could have happened in the SNES/Megadrive days.
Please, give me an example.
i-ninja-u-dead

Actually that is not a leak. The developers are now allowed to release concept art about their games for the revolution, so maybe NIBRIS might put up their concept art again soon.

Really? Where'd you hear that?

Nintendo (Iwata? Myamoto?) said that. i think it was on TGS or that thing on December 2. they said that any 3rd party can should anykind of picture or info from their own games for Rev, before E3.

19 years ago

spd39th

Follow

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 spd39th

Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts

Yes, but you compare the graphical difference of 1 game to another. But the topic is explaining HD. And HD only allows you to achieve a better visual clarity. It's a given that games from one time period to another will have progression. But the only benefit that HD is gonna give you is a clearer vision.Reptile711

all i'm saying is that the first games of each console are diferent from the last and all i gave are examples from diferent periods of this gen. is not about clarity.
and i am the one that are comparing the current games, the last games from this generation from the very first games of the next? it doesn't make sense.

19 years ago

spd39th

Follow

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 spd39th

Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts

[QUOTE="Reptile711"][QUOTE="spd39th"]

where are all the trolls coming from all of the sudden?!! if you dont have something decent to say go to system wars with that trashshrum91

what exactly did i said wrong before?

compare this... for example, Eternal Darkness and RE4, are the graphics the same? the first Tekken of PS2 is the same as Tekken 5? the first Halo is the same as Half Life 2? for seeing this, i am a fanboy? all of you are talking about the graphics of Xbox 360 from his FIRST and comparing with the LAST games of GC. am i that wrong? is this trolling? am i a fanboy to say that? 360 is only 3 months old, not 5 years. Xbox 360 is going happen to PS3 AND Rev like it happen to PS2, GC, Xbox and it will happen in the next-next-gen... you can't compare FIRST games with LAST. give it time, then, we can compare exactly.

The visual clarity was EXACTLY THE SAME. Whether you saw more polygons or more leaves in a tree or in the environment/models for that matter, the resolution is exactly the same. Tekken1 and Tekken5 are different in the polygonal aspect. Simply because they were able to take better advantage of what they had. They improvised. But what was limited to them, stayed in every game. The visual clarity may differ, but the resolution? EXACTLY THE SAME.

what clarity? when did i said to that? i mean EVERY ASPECT OF GRAPHICS, not clarity.

and you still don't know what i'm talking about.

19 years ago

spd39th

Follow

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 spd39th

Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts

I admit it does look better... but is it worth paying $50-60 more on the console and $5 more on every game?
monty_4256

no but what can we do? to wait till they drop is probably a solution but not final.
everything is increasing, the bigger the tecnology is, the bigger is the price. isn't this obvious?

look, i'm not saying that what you're talking about is all wrong or is just rubish. is just it doesn't make sense to compare games from different generation when one of them is just starting, it's way too soon to have a decent opinion, even if there's almost no difference between them.

19 years ago

spd39th

Follow

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 spd39th

Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts

where are all the trolls coming from all of the sudden?!! if you dont have something decent to say go to system wars with that trashshrum91

what exactly did i said wrong before?

compare this... for example, Eternal Darkness and RE4, are the graphics the same? the first Tekken of PS2 is the same as Tekken 5? the first Halo is the same as Half Life 2? for seeing this, i am a fanboy? all of you are talking about the graphics of Xbox 360 from his FIRST and comparing with the LAST games of GC. am i that wrong? is this trolling? am i a fanboy to say that? 360 is only 3 months old, not 5 years. Xbox 360 is going happen to PS3 AND Rev like it happen to PS2, GC, Xbox and it will happen in the next-next-gen... you can't compare FIRST games with LAST. give it time, then, we can compare exactly.

19 years ago

spd39th

Follow

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 spd39th

Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts

[QUOTE="spd39th"] it's funny to compare the FIRST Xbox 360 games with the LAST GC games... oh yes, the graphics from the FIRST GC games are exactly the same to the LAST GC games, the same happens to PS2 and Xbox... [sarcasm] shrum91

you = fanboy

fanboy of women? always.

19 years ago

spd39th

Follow

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 spd39th

Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts

it's funny to compare the FIRST Xbox 360 games with the LAST GC games... oh yes, the graphics from the FIRST GC games are exactly the same to the LAST GC games, the same happens to PS2 and Xbox... [sarcasm]

19 years ago

spd39th

Follow

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 spd39th