The best FPS on the PS2 is Black.
steveroger's forum posts
Updated from the News, it is tough to track news comments:
ItsEvolution Posted May 10, 2009 10:17 am MT
"ItsEvolution
I'm going to stop looking at the comment section for this article. No one is actually reading the article, and it's getting frustrating. WII SPORTS DOES NOT COME WITH THE SYSTEM IN OTHER COUNTRIES. PAY ATTENTION, ****!!"
Maybe you need to pay attention the article doesn't break down the sales figures to show the number of stand alone sales for Wii play and sports compared to those sold as a bundles with consoles and controllers. They just give raw data of number of play and sports titles sold.
But what does that tell you about the Wii? More of the same really. First party software rules the roost.
While this is good for Nintendo which is what the article says and is about. But the real issue is whether this is good news for gamers.
Which IMO it is not.
Why? Because Nintendo would be pumping out quality First Party titles without the huge sales numbers of the Wii. But the huge sales numbers of the Wii and it's first party software is putting a stranglehold on the market of third party games.
Why is that?
[QUOTE="steveroger"]Wii IMO is basically the toasterCherokee_JackWell, you know what they say... What do they say? Also, don't take may comment out of context. I meant to say that it was popular but has lower thirty party sales then the PS3 and 360. But I would like to know why. By doing hangng this statement out there without any context it makes it seem really negative. Again, I did not call it a coaster. But I have no idea what you are trying to actually imply.
NO I AM NOT 'INTERPRETING POOR THIRD PARTY SALES WITH SOMETHING NEGATIVE'. I didn't say that whatsoever. Look at what I wrote. I am saying something completely different.
I think something more than just poor third party software is going on here. Just like the PSP has troubles with third party sales, so does the DS. But why? Why don't the developers make better software? I think it has to do with how they perceive the installed base.
Why can't I have opinions about the installed base of the three consoles? I am a user of all the consoles and I have access to statistics. Not complete access but enough to entertain a discussion.
Don't go off about Negative and postive comments. That has very little to do with the discussion. What does the sales figures of consoles vs. titles tell us? The possibilities are big. There is no reaon to avoid discussion.
What I am saying is there is no way to know why 3rd party sales are low on the Wii, so there is no point in speculation why it could possibly be. It could be anything. Yeah, it could be anything. But if we all took your positon then there would be nothing to talk about. The experiences we have the statistics we have access to create a legitamte basis for discussion. Makes no sense to just try and derail discussion because there are many possible interpretations. Just like it makes no sense to say what sikanderahmed just said. that 95 % of wii games are a complete joke. That is just an endpoint to avoid discussion.Fine, play a semantics game. I never said the Wii wasn't a success. The point of the metaphor is that everybody wants a toaster. Toasters are a success. Give me a break, this is a systems wars thread. There is supposed to be some competitive discussion.
But like I said, if I was really trying to be negative I would have said "coaster."
God, it would be really boring to write a thread that said. Gee those are nice sales figures for the wii it is a success. Duh!
But, acording to Nielsen, the Wii is right nowthe most played console of this generation:
IronBass
You are didn't read my post correctly. See my second post for further clarification. I called the Wii a paradox. My kids have a Wii, they play first party Wii titles only as a preference. So they contribute the high use numbers but they prefer the 360 and PS3. But they aren't like the population that normally wouldn't buy so many video games. That graph really poses more questions than answers.
http://kotaku.com/5222086/ps3-tie-ratio-overtakes-wii-tie-ratio
http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=20988
http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=69324
Based on your graph, I just looked up on the net about attach rates and tie ratios. First, they aren't the same things. Second, whether you are looking at tie ratios or attach rates, the Wii is last.
Also, I am certain that the Wii really lags in tie ration and attach rates for Third Party titles. That is really significant.
Nintendo is the toaster, but I would say that would make the 360 a microwave oven and the PS3 toaster oven. LOL.
I am not trying to insult the Wii or Nintendo. It is just a funnymetaphor to get the discussion started about the fact that the Wii sells a huge number of consoles but not a huge number of individual third pary games.
It seems proven that huge market penetration dilutes third pary sales. But the raw number of consoles out there helps keep the raw sales figures high per title.
Therefore, the Wii is a paradox. It is wildly popular, that popularity, drags down indidual third party title says per unit, but the high number of units increase the number of titles sold. Do you see what I mean?
I suppose this is because the Wii is bought by people who normally just don't buy that many video games. But it increase the number of video games sold because it taps into a normally tight fisted bunch of consumers.
That is why I call it a toaster. Please note I am not calling it a coaster! That would be negative.
Log in to comment