LMAO. Its always hilarious when I read devs stating "I am a huge fan of Nintendo blah blah and some obtuse reason why they won't develop for the system".

Nailed it on the head. We're oppressing our constitutional right to not offend certain people. I'm sick and tired of not being able to speak my mind without some overly sensitive person taking things too seriously. Lighten up. Make fun of horrible people. They deserve it.

I didn't make a claim every child played with dolls the same way, I said liking dolls is not dependent upon gender. Glad you don't care about politics. I am sure you are a major fan of the studies that generate the ">50% of games are female" statistics.

You may be right if i was blaming Obama or the democrats.

But i am not. In fact i am not really blaming anyone, just saying that the PC culture and the ultra left wing nuts like SJW, people who complain over names etc. is why someone like Trump can come and catch ordinary people's vote. Because they are simply tired of the progressive and "everythingoffend" culture.

I feel like this PC movement is almost regressive. People should be able to laugh about such things at this point. Was it a horrible part of history? Absolutely, but acting like it never happened or not being to find humor in making fun of nazi's/hitler is sad. Let's never talk about anything or joke ever again. That is what we're heading towards and it needs to stop.

Action figures are by definition dolls. From the wiki of the fox who coined the phrase:

The conventional marketing wisdom of the early 1960s was that boys would not play with dolls, thus the word "doll" was never used by Hasbro or anyone involved in the development or marketing of G.I. Joe. "Action figure" was the only acceptable term, and has since become the generic description for any poseable doll intended for boys. "America's movable fighting man" is a registered trademark of Hasbro, and was prominently displayed on every boxed figure package.

The only difference between dolls and action figures is branding specifically designed to address the "Dolls are for girls" insecurity. This is one of the reasons gender is such a silly concept. Things arbitrarily categorized as "feminine" must be given a "masculine" sounding name before it is acceptable for little boys to get excited about them. Their disposition doesn't change, only society's perception, and thus endorsement, of it.

And I didn't say statistics are not worth studying. They are however data points, not truth. A sound conclusion usually involves as many as possible, not one that lines up with your preexisting assumption. This is incredibly important in humanities, as data points often contradict each other, and are usually gathered to serve an agenda. Given your stance I am pretty sure I can illustrate this point nicely with just two words:

Feminist Statistics.

If I was having the same conversation with your liberal equivalent, I would need only go with the word Republican.

Engineering is mess right now. Most from my class went on to become glorified construction managers, or electricians in the oil patch.