@Kezzy123: When you can't produce a reasonable rebuttal, resort to logical extremes.

This is why a single reviewer from a website is a flawed system. Every game on your site is reviewed by different reviewers with different preferences and standards. Review by committee should be the norm for websites. It is totally different if people are logging on for a particular reviewer's opinion, but this is Gamespot's review However, tomorrow Gamespot might give it a different score based on who gets the assignment.

Still probably a great game, but a flawed review system

@crashchaos: Now you get screwed by the boss and the union. Modern Unions are so incredibly corrupt.

LOL, Did anyone even notice? They could've striked forever and the industry wouldn't have been negatively affected in any way.

I'm curious how many AFK's. It was a mistake to add loot boxes.

@7tizz: Who said that?

Those features are not the main component of the game. The gameplay itself simply does what has been done many times before. But it does it well. Im not knocking the game, but it is not original in any way. And BTW, PUBG doesnt have over a hundred players either.

PUBG is not original.

Let the game speak for themselves. What do you have to worry about if you feel you have the better game.

Big Star Trek fan... I wont be paying.

"caused some confusion" ???? honestly, who is really confused?

Looking amazing.