[QUOTE="strikeagain"][QUOTE="the-creeper"]No apollo didnt killed any of those 3 cyclops.The 3 cyclops and the hundred hands after the war with the titans zeus gave them the responsibility to guard tartarus and also make them assistants to hephaistous work.
By the way orion was a giant and he was normal not a monster like the other children of poseidon.
For the sake of example to my claim that there is almost always multiple tellings of the same stories...
Ex: Look at the stories of origin for most any creature/god/hero. Hephaestus has a few alternate telling to his few stories.
Apollo did kill them in one telling. The myths sometimes contridict each other you'll find. Do not think it is all dealt in absolutes. It really doesn't take much research to notice this.
Orion is a PERFECT example of my point...Wiki
~You see..by some accounts he isn't even a son of Poseidon..isn't that something? Greek Mythology..gotta love it despite the difficulties presented by conflicting tales..discussion can be difficult if one of the participants doesn't realize there is more then a few versions of their favorite tale
Yes agreed those others versions of mythology is probably , how other ppl saw some parts of mythology and translated with their own way thats something nature not all ppl have the same opinion about some part of mythology some says this is wrong some others says thats true its also how you understand something.
A bit problematic for simply discussions don't you agree?..A subject that has debatable versions of the Myths. Comes with the territory I suppose.
Now for the apollon that killed the original cyclops as you said ill will do a little search and ill write again.
Something to do with Zeus killing some guy Apollo liked. Apollo lashed out about it but clearly wasn't going to attack Zeus himself.
the-creeper
i dont think problematic is the absolutly the right word i think challenging and interesting are better as words to describe this dont you think?
In a more optimisitic view then my own, yes. If both sides (speakers in this case) are willing to hear out the other and research the claims they put forth fairly..then yes, more can be taken from such a conversation then a meere agreement of shared 'facts'.
~One can't help but wonder...how are we to include a fair amount of the Heroes, Beasts and Gods remaining into the PSP and PS3 GoW titles to in a sense.."wrap things up" neatly? I can see the PS3 title being strained heavily with all the gods and titans running around..would it be up to the PSP title to cover some of the heroes and beasts we've yet to see? If this were the case I'd expect the last of the HUGE beasts and most prolific heroes to appear in the PS3 title. That would at least seem sensible to me
That will be quite difficult to warp things up between psp title and gow3 but there are many monsters in greek mythology so im not worrying so much about that.
You know im still wondering why they put kraken that i dont think this beast belongs to greek mythology and they didnt put the scylla or harivdi or the cancer (a giant crab that was servant o hera) or even the sea moster that perseus petrefied with the gorgon's head.
Log in to comment