Halo 2 just came out on PC. If you really want to claim ownage, because Halo 2 is no long exclusive to the original Xbox, go right ahead. I won't stop you. The Lemmings are looking forward to Halo 3, which is exclusive to Xbox 360.

If, 3 years from now, Halo 3 has come out on PC, and you really want to look back and claim owange over us all, once again, I will not stop you. Until that time though, this argument is pointless. 3 years from now it will probably be pointless as well, because who really cares about a 3 year old game.

[QUOTE="swamprat_basic"]

Could it be that it actually was flaxseed oil? Regardless of whether Bonds is guilty or not, he is being tried in the court of public opinion. People are guilty of crimes, only when they have been proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt. And you cannot prove someone guilty of a crime without evidence.

GamerForca

Yeah, because it would totally make sense for him to say he took the clear if it was actually flaxseed oil.:|

It's already a FACT that he took roids, but there are two reasons they haven't convicted him: 1. There was no rule against roids when he did them. 2. There is no proof he took them knowingly (besides common sense).

Bonds never said that he used steroids, and he's been pretty careful about his words. He said that he used a clear substance, and that he was told it was Flaxseed Oil. Do I think that he took steroids? Probably, but I also believe that people are innocent until proven guilty, and I will not join in the trying of somebody in a court of public opinion.

The law is supposed to work separate from public opinion, and in my opinion the whole Bonds issue has been a major mistake in that regard. You cannot assume anything in a court of law. The truth can be completely bizarre. Who knows what actually happened? You seem to think you do, but you don't know for sure. Nobody does, except for possibly Barry, and maybe he actually is as big an idiot as he claims make him seem.

The reason why nobody has convicted Bonds of anything is because nothing has been proven as fact. He is still playing ball, and as far as I'm concerned, until somebody tests him and finds illegal steroids in his system, nobody can make any claim to the facts. He is still playing; he is still hitting homeruns. Have they tested him for steroids? I have a feeling that they have not, because at this point, they cannot afford to have his test come up negative.

[QUOTE="BlackVII"][QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="BlackVII"]

Yeah, I'm very happy Bonds tied the record. And it gets really annoying when people say Bonds took steroids when it hasn't even been proven. People always hate on him because they know he owns.

GamerForca

Is him saying hetook them not proof enough?

Bonds said he used a clear substance and a cream given to him by a trainer who was indicted in a steroid-distribution ring, but said he didn't know they were steroids. So, you can't really say if he knew they were steroids or not. He could be telling the truth or could be lying.

Whether you believe he did them knowingly or not, the bottom line is that he took them and Aaron didn't. But there was the guy on ESPN the other day that said based on taste, there's no way you can get the "clear" mixed up with flaxseed oil.

Could it be that it actually was flaxseed oil? Regardless of whether Bonds is guilty or not, he is being tried in the court of public opinion. People are guilty of crimes, only when they have been proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt. And you cannot prove someone guilty of a crime without evidence.

And y2kzorak your sig is terrible, the ceo was right, fun is different for each person. Not a stupid comment at all.

Unholy_Smite

Regarding the question he was asked, it was an incredibly stupid comment.

Considering that the graphics are how your brain interprets what is going on in the game, yes, they are important. They are as much a part of the gameplay as the gameplay itself.