[QUOTE="tegovoltio"]The whole option 3 is not going to work. It's not that hard to pick a winner. PPl who are mostly about it are some who can't accept their favorite console lost. Just because it's your preference that doesn't make it overall better.
Like applying option 3 to a console like the 3DO or saying the dreamcast won just because it had your favorite game.
flintgijoe
That is what System Wars always has been. See, you can say whatever you want, but if you can't support your statements, you will be exposed as a fanboy/ignorant/close minded/ or worse. In other words you will be owned. It isn't hard to pick a winner, sure. But it is almost impossible to find a good balanced fair system that a majority would find acceptable means to determine the winner. How could you compare the PC with PS3/Xbox with the Wii with DS/PSP in an accurate manner that would take in consideration important factors like Game Reviews/quality, Sales, Attach Rates, prospects, price points, consumer satisfaction, etc... ?
Most of the "Systems" aren't really even competing with each other in the marketplace (a.k.a. reality). PC doesn't compete directly with Xbox/PS3, which doesn't really compete directly with Wii, which doesn't compete directly with DS/PSP, which doesn't compete directly with mobles, etc... Peter Moore going around trumpeting Wii60 is just one of many examples of that.
Option 3 is the way to go. Let arguments stand or fall by thier own strength.
I know what you are saying and I agree to some point. For example Gamecube is supposed to come last, but I think it had better games than the Xbox. It doesn't matter since it's got less sales and didn't have a big library either. That doesn't change my view of the console. Option 3 is valid when we are discussing opinions, you just can't declare the GC winner because it had your favorite game.
I didn't vote because I think that it has always been a combination of option 1 and 2. Ppl are trying to change it now because of the Wii factor.
Log in to comment