I guess they just assumed that everyone knew it was on Playstation 3 because they have been hearing about it alot, and because it is in the Playstation 3 section of the site?Fredrick2003x
I've just read the MGS4 review of Gamespot and it is absolutely right. It deserves a big 10/10. But I've noticed that they don't talk about the Playstation 3 even once.
Is it me, or there is something strange about that? If you see what I mean...?
Eh gamespot, the day they give really good ps3 exlcusives games a ten, is the day i get away dating jessica alba, :P, i dont think itll happen though, this is gamespot remember, a site runned by a 360 co-manager :) realistic44
Why would Sony do that? I dont understand why any company would release add on's like that because they just dont work. Now what Sony could do is release a system that revolves around motion sensing. Like a PS2 with motion sensing that would definately sell alot better than some add-on.
Xcaliber26
"Why would Sony do that?" Em because Wii is outselling PS3 by a margin of almost 3 to 1. I other words to attract casual gamers. Right now PS3 is being sold only to hardcore gamers.
"I dont understand why any company would release add on's like that because they just dont work." Add-on actually works, (see Sing Star, Guitar Hero, Rack Band for further information. lol)
PlayStation blog PlayStationLife****net tell us today that Sony have been testing a PlayStation 3 motion-sensing 'remote', a PS3mote, that they reckon was first tested earlier this year in California.
The blog believe you can connect up to four remotes at the same time, and they have a range of capabilities. Mini-games including tennis, fencing and paintball are mooted, and the writer even mentions Quake being played on a laptop via one of the remotes.
The remotes apparently communicate with the PS3 via a 'tripod' device, linked to the USB port. This technology may change before a final release however, we're told.
The device is said to be incredibly accurate, although this could of course all be nonsense. We'll try and find out more.
Source
So here it is. It's a rumour from an unaccurate source taken from another unaccurate source! Lolz Anyways, that'd be interesting...
Still alot of money for a damn demo, yes I said DEMO, of a game that they are still making. I can't believe fanboys actually buy this crap. They are giving you an UNFINISHED VERSION of the game and making you pay for it. Imagine if they did that with a GTA game. What if they just finished half the city and half the missions, then stripped out all the extra features and sold it for 40 bucks and told you to wait for the proper version later on for 60 more bucks.Lobster_Ear
It cannot be compared with GTA or any story based game. 'cause it's a racing game that you can play over and over again. anyone who likes cars would do that
Log in to comment