Ok, i've got my fair share of bitching to do about this supposed "100 Best RPGs of all time" list. First, Skyrim shouldn't be #1, I love Skyrim to death, but story and graphics were ok at best, and the game was a buggy mess at launch, and still partially is. The way I look at it, no Bethesda game has a place in the top 10, and I LOVE Bethesda, but their games are ALWAYS buggy and near Broken, and a majority of them STILL are years later. I also think that WoW doesn't have a place that high on the list, i'd say like 20 or so, but There are just better titles on the list. Bloodborne is not an RPG, Pokemon has no place within the top 50, Kingdom Hearts is more action than RPG. Now i'm curious as to how the actual **** Mass Effect 3 hit within the top 50 while the original is in the 60s, when the original is the better RPG, no competition. Also, Dragon Age Inquisition has no place in the top 100 at all, I mean it was an ok game, but just not a terribly great RPG, same thing with XCOM, it just isn't an RPG :/ Now can I ask how the actual shit Mario got on the list? Not once, but twice, just how?! Now on notes of Nintendo, why is BotW on the list and not other objectively better Zelda games like Majora's Mask, Windwaker, or Ocerina of Time? Honestly BotW had a very horizontal progression, with no real gain in power, and that is ESSENTIAL for an RPG to get right. And why are Castlevania and Dragon's Dogma so low? They honestly deserve a higher rank, at least in my eye. And, I want an explanation as to why Destiny, Horizon Zero Dawn, and Stick of Truth are even on here at all, they were all bad at being RPGs, but none were particularly bad games. That is pretty much it aside from really small details that are primarily irrelevant.
Log in to comment