Things are slowly brightening up for PC IMO. As long as the game runs in a smooth clip and looks good up close like Mass Effect 3, I'm happy. Multiplatform games don't look so bad now. I know many gamers hate EA for various reasons, but I find that their dev's ports usually run pretty good and look great after the bugs have been ironed out.
Concerning the pics of hi-res antialiased Gamcube and Wii screenshots, it's fairly easy to make cell-shaded graphics look great at a higher res because the geometry isn't as apparent, but the same outcome doesn't apply to the generic rendering style.
Like some have commented previously: it's not cheap to make good graphics, though with the improvements in game engines, I imagine that itwill be very soon, as engines like CryEngine 3 or the Arma III engine become licensable. While it's easier to implement great lighting and shaders, it will still take time and resources to create them.
Concerning consoles, some people just want to buy a $400 system once and be set for the next couple years. PC gaming has a rep for having a steep enterance fee, but that's slowly changing as todays mid-range budget cards are equivalent to yesterday's high-end. Essentially, an acceptable CPU and GPU can be had for at the most, 150$ each, making it easy to build a budget system capable of decent gaming for the same price as a console. If you really want to squeeze every penny, you can try ebay or craigslist, which will grant you even better savings. I got my GTX 560 ti for $125 there. If I'm not mistaken, I would spend nearly twice that on Newegg or Amazon.
Log in to comment