" Microsoft calls its Xbox One an "all-in-one" experience designed to function as the heart of a user's living room."
Meaning that the Xbox One continues the 360 tradition of being more of a multimedia device as oppose to a gaming console while Microsoft focuses on time exclusive content more then building up a large library of first party titles? If that's the case then I will pass. But hey, it's not like I'm planning to buy a new console in the next 8 months anyways.
I'm surprised lucasart's lasted as long as it did. They didn't seem like they were making tons off of titles since the 90s sales wise. Honestly I wouldn't surprised if gearbox picks up 1313.
@theKSMM That would be a advantage that the vita would have over the 3ds, since nintendo(at least right now) didn't push for small developers to produce that type of content.
If you prefer sequels that feel more like expansion backs. To be honest the current 3ds library like the games you mentioned really do make the system look bad in terms of lacking new games.
While that isn't shocking, in general 3ds users don't point out the vita has a situation that the 3ds appears to have, that is lack of quality titles. Both handhelds seem to be geared towards consumers who want sequels and versions/ports of older games. Besides gravity rush, a gamer would make themselves look bad to say both handhelds have ground breaking titles. Even with the 3ds having good graphics and the vita having more physical buttons alongside a touchscreen, at the end of the day the 3DS doesn't live up to the hype and the Vita doesn't have enough new good games.
Resistance FOM, uncharted 2, and LBP anyone? To be fair, those titles came out around the first 3 years of the consoles cycle and didn't fit the 'mediocre' category.
tidusjeff's comments