[QUOTE="tigermario"]Terrible? Take off the fanboy goggles[QUOTE="Luigi_Vincetana"]No way. M:OM looks terrible (aesthetically, at least). It's a huge step down from the brilliance that was MP3:C's art design. Wii's graphic king is Probably Muramasa. SH:SM for 3D king.Luigi_Vincetana
tigermario's forum posts
Nothing you said changes the fact that everything he said was true :|The PS3 has amazing games, free online, blu-ray functionality, wi-fi out of the box and the most promising future. Why have any of you given this obvious troll 9 pages?
The_Brodeo
*Yawn* "The GC could do better" line stopped being funny when it stopped being true. Everybody who's not a fanboy knows you'recompletely full of it. Is that really the best you can do?[QUOTE="tigermario"]
[QUOTE="St_muscat"] No I think your covering up for your fanboyism by saying it looks incredible, seriously the GC could pull off those graphics and the games art ****is no where near as good as past Metroid games, but the game itself (the most important part) looks good at least, just the graphics look like a good last gen game, eg. GoW 2. Anyway I think the Wii's graphics king what I've seen is probably Monster Hunter 3.
St_muscat
Dude I own a Wii and 15 games (19 if you count ones I've traded in but beaten) for it and had it since launch and have no plans to sell it, considering how full of win 2010 Wii lineup is. But Metorid: Other M is not a good looking game, its art style is bland and the techinical graphics from the screenshots look no better than Resident Evil 4 on the GC, seriously go play it and you'll see, but by the sound of it you skipped last gen and totally have no idea what a last gen game looks like if you think this is a fantasic looking game.
Pic of Wii with a sign next to it with your avatar namewritten on it or it didnt happen.lol no[QUOTE="tigermario"]
[QUOTE="TaMuK711"]
Red Steel 2 is much more asthetically pleasing, imo.
TaMuK711
Very articulate, care to expand? Art style that covers up the Wii's weakness for photo-realism > M:oM style. The only thing graphically pleasing in the trailer were the CG parts..
I just think you're full of it... that's all. No offence or anything.I'm not saying the artsyle isnt superb, but technically a non cellshaded game is much more advanced and difficult to accomplish.Honestly, I think RS2 looks a bit better.
goblaa
lol no[QUOTE="tigermario"]
[QUOTE="TaMuK711"]
Red Steel 2 is much more asthetically pleasing, imo.
St_muscat
You must be a very bland and boring person then if you think Metroid: Other M's article is good, let alone better than Redsteel 2's. Actually how about you name some games which iyo have a good art styles, because this I want to see.
Okami, Murumasa, Uncharted, PoP, Metroid another M, KillzoneIt looks incredible. All those who deny it are just covering up for their fanboyism. No I think your covering up for your fanboyism by saying it looks incredible, seriously the GC could pull off those graphics and the games art ****is no where near as good as past Metroid games, but the game itself (the most important part) looks good at least, just the graphics look like a good last gen game, eg. GoW 2. Anyway I think the Wii's graphics king what I've seen is probably Monster Hunter 3.*Yawn* "The GC could do better" line stopped being funny when it stopped being true. Everybody who's not a fanboy knows you'recompletely full of it. Is that really the best you can do?[QUOTE="tigermario"]
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
Most People?
What kind of people did they interview, Tecmo and NOA staff?
St_muscat
... all they have done this gen is lose money and marketshare. Sales from first party franchises and hardware sales have been underwhelming if not completely disasterous.
If you were Sony, what would you do next?
Log in to comment