I do not think so; at least, if hisory repeats itself.

Ouya's model was tried before - the First generation of video game consoles. Atari did not have any control over the games that were not first party. All you needed was a computer that could write the code, and you could make your own games. This ended up being a huge issue because inevitably there were 100s of incredibly crap-tastic games that came out for the first generation systems in the early 80s. It ended up causing Atari's downfall, and was a main contributor to the great video game crash of 1983.

Nintendo saved the industry with the NES - not just by creating new and innovative titles, but also by forcing all game developers to pass Nintendo's QA.

With Ouya, the Atari (and ColecoVision, Odyssey, and Intellivision for that matter) business model is being applied: open source game development. History has proven that is not a good thing.

StormyJoe

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="Grawse"]Yeah the controls for MGS3 are a nightmare, can only imagine how bad it will be for MGS2, They should have given those games MGS4 controls :(

GreenGoblin2099

What?? MGS2 has great controls and I reckon MGS3 had some serious camera problems but they were fixed for the Subsistance version, which is included in the HD Collection.

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]A simple HD facelift released digitally would satisfy me. I'd prefer MGS 2 and 3 to be remade with MGS 4's controls. I never finished those because the control schemes are so bad, don't know if the recent re-releases fix things though.Grawse

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="soapandbubbles"] Play MGS3DS then, pretty much the same controls/view as MGS4. GreenGoblin2099

Why not the HD collection??

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]A simple HD facelift released digitally would satisfy me. I'd prefer MGS 2 and 3 to be remade with MGS 4's controls. I never finished those because the control schemes are so bad, don't know if the recent re-releases fix things though.soapandbubbles