TotalMalnutrit's forum posts

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@Maroxad said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@Maroxad said:

I am pro-abortion until fetal viability.

@comp_atkins said:

"pro abortion"

the hell?

It is the more neutral terminology. Regarding this issue.

Since Pro-Life and Pro-Choice often come across as too biased.

to me pro-abortion comes and pro-life come off as biased. Pro-choice is the only honest, neutral one. Pro-lifers would have the mother die to save the child's life, what's pro-life about that? Or let her commit suicide after she found out she got pregnant after being gang-raped and couldn't live with the guilt of having to carry a baby to term she didn't want. How is that pro-life?

There's more to life than just lives. Like, you know...the living, for example.

Pro-Life is biased as hell as well. In the end, both are using loaded language like choice or life. All both terms achieved was to open up the door to red herrings,

Pro-Choice: You call yourself pro-choice, yet you believe in gun control and environmental regulations?

Pro-Life: You call yourself pro life, yet support starving children, wars and the death penalty?

Note that both of these red herring assertions can be very much false.

With pro-abortion and anti-abortion, you suddenly close down a lot of doors to potential red herrings. And it comes with none of the loaded language too.

Uhh...that's a damn big blanket statement there.

I'm a pro-life conservative who does not support the death penalty, wars without justification....or "starving children"? What the hell do you even mean by that? I donate money every month to starving children...automatic draft out of my bank account.

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@ronvalencia said:

In Genesis 2:7, declaring that God “breathed into his [Adam’s] nostrils the soul of life, and man became a living soul.” The verse implies that until Adam took his first breath he was not considered a living being.

There are so many things completely wrong with your entire post but because I'm at work and can't pick it apart at the moment I'll just point out what should be obvious.

Genesis 2:7

You're taking the words completely literal and it's not meant to be taken that way. He's saying that Adam became a living soul when he gave him life. It's not saying that God put his physical mouth over Adams nose and breathed air into his lungs. It's not even referring to taking a breath at all...it's simply talking about the beginning of human life as a SOUL.

The problem comes when people look for the most obvious way to twist the words to their liking. If you're going to read the Bible do your research and try understanding the times and read some commentaries from people who have really studied this.

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@iandizion713 said:
@totalmalnutrit said:
@iandizion713 said:

@totalmalnutrit: Hes who used Republicans. He claims to know how Republicans think and how to use that to his advantage. Seems he was right, maybe Republicans do vote by feelings and not facts. Maybe thats why Newt won.

Again he's just a man making claims. Maybe he was right why? I don't understand what point you're trying to make. Newt does not speak for everyone in the party and I don't even understand what he was trying to say as it didn't make any sense.

It didnt have to make sense, thats the whole point. Making sense dont make him dollars. It just have to touch peoples feelings. He wants your heart, not your brain. Hed lose support if he used facts.

And you don't think the democrats do the same thing? Oh come on man, you can't really believe that. Have you not listened to Hillary's speeches? Or most the democrat party with all the "you're not being treated fairly" attitude? Oh please....it's a 2 way street.

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@totalmalnutrit: Hes who used Republicans. He claims to know how Republicans think and how to use that to his advantage. Seems he was right, maybe Republicans do vote by feelings and not facts. Maybe thats why Newt won.

Again he's just a man making claims. Maybe he was right why? I don't understand what point you're trying to make. Newt does not speak for everyone in the party and I don't even understand what he was trying to say as it didn't make any sense.

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@totalmalnutrit: Hes the guy who ran Trumps campaign and who Trump just made Secretary of State. Hes a fool who uses feeling instead of facts to gain support. Hes a tool for the rich elite.

But that makes him who he is...he's not "republicans". Are you basing your opinion of facts or feelings? He's just one man...

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@totalmalnutrit: It points to the theory that people who vote Republican usually vote with feelings rather then facts. Heres your homeboy Trump just put back in power.

Loading Video...

They went after yalls feelings, they dont care for facts.

So he is "republican" or "all republicans"? Bit of a blanket statement, no?

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@totalmalnutrit: It points to the theory that people who vote Republican usually vote with feelings rather then facts.

Well that's an interesting point of view seeing how the liberals are the ones constantly crying about how their feeling are hurt. Always crying about "be he said ____ and it's not nice"...."he's so offensive". Yet it's the republicans who are driven by feeling.

That's ok though as I really don't see anything wrong with feelings. It's a part of what makes us who we are, no?

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@bforrester420 said:

@totalmalnutrit: You say facetious, I say fatuous

Can't argue with that but then it was all in fun.

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@bforrester420 said:
@totalmalnutrit said:
@bforrester420 said:

I'm going out on a limb and guessing you're among the non-college educated whites that gave Trump the election. Congratulations on your "success". We'll see what kind of merit this post has once the mid-term elections roll around.

I'm not an "non-college educated white" but I find it interesting that say that as if they are lesser people. So racist...

Based on your grammar, I can't imagine you're college educted. Maybe a marketing major, lel.

So I'm racist against members of my own race who don't seek to improve themselves via formal education? That makes sense...

Ok so my education is based off of a message board post.

I'm curious...you pointed out that "non-college educated whites" voted for Trump. Do you look down on the "non-college educated whites"? I ask because you posted that as if you were somehow a better person than someone "non-college educated". Maybe you have more to offer? Maybe your vote is more valid?

If that's what you think you really are the douche you admit to being. It doesn't matter if your college professor, someone working on an oil rig or mowing lawns...no one is better than another.

By the way mr "you have to have great grammar on the video-game forums" you spelled educated wrong. :)

Avatar image for totalmalnutrit
TotalMalnutrit

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TotalMalnutrit
Member since 2016 • 86 Posts

@sayyy-gaa said:
@totalmalnutrit said:
@bforrester420 said:

I'm going out on a limb and guessing you're among the non-college educated whites that gave Trump the election. Congratulations on your "success". We'll see what kind of merit this post has once the mid-term elections roll around.

I'm not an "non-college educated white" but I find it interesting that say that as if they are lesser people. So racist...

There's nothing racist about that post. We all need to stop using that word out of context as it's a serious accusation and over use diminishes its value.

If you think @bforrester420 is a douche or an idiot than say that. BTW no offense bforrester just making a point. Don't call the guy a racist when he is making a distinction regarding groups of people in the SAME RACE.

I was being facetious as that is the go-to argument for liberals. :)