[QUOTE="nickmag"]
.2ndWonder
Rofl.
That's really good.
[QUOTE="nickmag"]
.2ndWonder
Rofl.
That's really good.
[QUOTE="Pangster007"]oh? and Halo isn't on the PC?
:lol:
CherryShooter
Halo for the Xbox is better then the one for the PC so that leaves Halo crowned with the best shooter.
Didn't seem to matter to you that BF2, Farcry, HL2, and all the other games you listed were better on PC.
oh? and Halo isn't on the PC?
:lol:
Pangster007
:lol: got em there
Tell me, how many lions have you beat the **** out of lately?CaptHawkeye
:lol:
[QUOTE="towel_"][QUOTE="legalize3"]haze makes the 2000 bucko crysis pc system not worth a penny
http://www.playsyde.com/stream_3884_en.html
i cant wait for the better video version
look i dont say it looks better then crysis but if a 600 bucko system can output these graphics ill pass on a 2000bucko system
jdang307
I like how you make the price for the PC as high as it can go, adding on all the extras just to make it look bad, and then you strip down the console prices to the bare minimum to make them look better.
The fact is, for Haze to look like that, you need your 400$, or 600$ console (360 or Ps3), and an HDTV, which will easily set you back at least 1700$. A top of the line PC would only cost around 1300 or less.
If you want to use the argument that you don't need an HDTV to play, then I'll use the argument that I don't need a top of the line PC to play Crysis either, even though you try to make it look that way.
Wait, so you want to add the price of an HDTV to the console, but no LCD price to the PC. At least $600 for a 24", or there's no comparison to playing a console on a large HDTV.Lucky for me computers are my hobby, and I get top of the line Intel procs for really cheap, so Crysis is definitely in my horizon once it comes out. I can play Crysis on my comp with 26" LCD, or Haze on my PS3 with a 97" Screen from my projector. I can hook the PC up to my projector but I don't feel like laying on my bed with a KB/M trying to play a FPS.
Sitting a foot and a half from a 19" monitor gives the same experience as 10 feet from a 50" tv. Good try.
haze makes the 2000 bucko crysis pc system not worth a penny
http://www.playsyde.com/stream_3884_en.html
i cant wait for the better video version
look i dont say it looks better then crysis but if a 600 bucko system can output these graphics ill pass on a 2000bucko system
legalize3
I like how you make the price for the PC as high as it can go, adding on all the extras just to make it look bad, and then you strip down the console prices to the bare minimum to make them look better. The fact is, for Haze to look like that, you need your 400$, or 600$ console (360 or Ps3), and an HDTV, which will easily set you back at least 1700$. A top of the line PC would only cost around 1300 or less. If you want to use the argument that you don't need an HDTV to play, then I'll use the argument that I don't need a top of the line PC to play Crysis either, even though you try to make it look that way.
LMAO PC GAMERS!!! Crysis is gonna set you back about 1-2k on a powful pc to run it at the state your looking at while on ps3 or 360 will only cost you 300-600$ to play on plus Haze looks nice for it being on consoles.KILLERJAK702KA
I like how you make the price for the PC as high as it can go, adding on all the extras just to make it look bad, and then you strip down the console prices to the bare minimum to make them look better.
The fact is, for Haze to look like that, you need your 400$, or 600$ console (360 or Ps3), and an HDTV, which will easily set you back at least 1700$. A top of the line PC would only cost around 1300 or less.
If you want to use the argument that you don't need an HDTV to play, then I'll use the argument that I don't need a top of the line PC to play Crysis either, even though you try to make it look that way.
Are they that retarted?Drizzt13
The irony.
Not paid attention to science? No one has ever seen the black stallion produce a timber wolf, i.e. macro-evolution. NEVER! I don't need to go any further than macro-evolution. In order for evolution to be true trillions of cells, each one more com plicated than any city in the world, would have to suddenly evolve all at once into I'll say a female species. Then you need for it to happen again and somehow evolve into a male. Now how evolution knows to evolve into a male you can't explain. And they have to evolve in the same time period otherwise the info is lost. This is rhe ridiculousness of evolution. I don't have enough fiath to believe in all that. Evolution is a religion. Macro-evolution has never been proven. NEVER! They point to micro to prove macro. Chemical hasn't been explained either. How do you get all those chemicals in the table? Evolution has no explanation except for pure fantasy. But that is religion not science.
maheo30
But its completely plausible to you that a superior being made man out of thin air, and then women out of a human rib? Interesting.
He won't reveal Himself to anybody, because then that would not be faith. Sorry.
Silver_Dragon17
How convenient. Ever consider that maybe He didn't reveal Himself because He isn't real?
Log in to comment