photo realism to me is I take photo of something and what i see is what i get, Games are no where near that. developers been using this term for 10+ years and it wasnt photorealism then and still isnt. impressive none the less. still think msg4 was showing off the pc verison
nice but will it look better then ps2 verison ran threw pcsx2 that can render the game at 6x the native res, with AA/FFXA? if not the dont care as i have both already and the look great on pcsx2
I dont see a huge differences, other then better textures and lighting. it not huge enough to make claim that it looks like another platform or next gen, which is not to say its not impressive considering the outdated ps3 tech. It not next gen or pc tech for sure.
yah and I bet in 5 years or so when EA kills the servers they will be praising EA too when they can no long play the game. This is not a MMO no should it run like one.
i dont like the idea at all I think alot people would be with me on this, but what happens when they shut the servers down and we can no long play said games cause of said bs?
The games arnt much more to make so that is all BS PC version of most console games are 10$ cheaper then the console version for most part. Look better play about the same despite being poorly ported like most pc games are these days. So they cant say it cost more every gen cause PC game prices have stay at general same price for 10+ years. and still LOOK way better then any console version ever has
tsunami2311's comments