tuddalicious' forum posts

  • 40 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts

Bioware makes RPGs, but Neverwinter Nights doesn't have many similarities to KOTOR. Bungie made Marathon, which was a FPS, and when they made Halo, it was very different from their Marathon games. But Tetris Attack and Pokemon Puzzle League, while not the same franchise, use the exact same gameplay mechanics, so one is the other's sequel.

It's easy to overreach with this reasoning, but I think the premise is sound.


People are trying to make my reasoning into a straw man (Sega 2k vs Madden... madden is not made by sega) or are trying to stretch it to the point of absurdity. Mass Effect and KOTOR are very similar games made by the same studio, with the same underlying gameplay, you might not agree, fine, but I see Mass Effect as a KOTOR sequel. I wasn't aware that was a bad thing. FF XI was a lot different than FF X, and FF XII is a huge jump from either, but they are sequels held together by a studio, gameplay, and some common themes. I don't see a great deal of difference between how it's going to feel for me to play Mass Effect versus how I felt playing KOTOR. Maybe if I had some nostalgia for the Star Wars universe, but I don't. They're sequels.

Crysis is the sequel to Far Cry... at least, the real Far Cry on PC. In fact, Crytek 2 is the engine sequel to Crytek.

Don't stretch it to the point of absurdity, and don't get so uptight about it. Mass Effect looks like a great game, but trying to pretend it's nothing like KOTOR is the only *real* stretch I see here. For someone who has played, and enjoyed, KOTOR and KOTOR II, the gameplay will be quite similar. They're not abandoning what they know works.

For it to a be sequel it would have to be a continuation of a previous story. Your argument fails on your usage of the word sequal, which is not objective.

Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts

All of your points come down to a matter of opinion really. I rarely run into people i have neg repped, only in the occurance that there are few people online at the time, something that happens during my late night sessions off SVR 2007.

If your not the type of person who interested in not only an solid, unified online structure but a community fostering entity, than I can see why you dislike live. I mean there have been many instances when I have chatted with family members and close friends on the 360 while playing seperate online games, watching movies or other task. Its just the level on connectivity through all those task that prove superior on live. For what you seem to need, just bare online multiplayer, free is fine. However, I really think its silly to complain about the price which, I mean 50 dollars a year and what have you sacraficed??? 12 number ones at Mickie D's....not anything budget killing to even most middle schoolers.

Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts
That is a fine point you make there. I wonder what rebuttals they can bring forth to counter that.
Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts
I was wondering if anyone knew whether or not DivX video would be supported in the upcoming dashboard update, I ask because DivX is a form of the MPeg-4 codec they are offering in the new update but i was not sure if this encompassed Div-X.
Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts
Great post man. This is definitely one of my top games.
Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts

same here..keep in mind that lair is in alpha build..so when the game done its goin to look more amazing then the video we see today..im waiting for uncharted, ratchet and clank, heavenly sword. and most important MGS4!!! and Final Fantasy VIII and Versus!! and dont forget the new team ico game !! if they take advantage of the ps3 cell or rsx all the games on the PS3 will be bad ass!!elementz28

Now I'll admit, that video impressed the heck out of me and im a XBOX 360 owner. However, to assume that because it is in Alpha that it will look even better is not a good philosophy. Bungie took the gameplay first and then graphics later stance but most developers do the graphics and downgrade as it interferes with the gameplay. It should look great but i'll take the wait and see approach. 

Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts
[QUOTE="csknifer"]

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"]Its got 6 months b4 release and there still on a Really old engine??? Whats going on??? You would think by now it would have a near final look. What the heII have they been doing all this time. -Maddog-

 

Ummm... have you been reading any of the posts?? ITS A PLACEHOLDER! wow... people now a days are just getting dumber and dumber...

 

EDIT: and also bungie announced that the beta version will look alot better so im guessing that it's gonna be running on the Halo 3 engine

 

lol you probably have know idea what your talking about...sit down. Placeholders at this stage??? What happen to the realtime trailer they showed at E3 2006 which is OLD and looked amazing..claiming this is how the game will look like...why arn't we seeing those visuals now if it was possible then???

 

You lemmings are dumber and dumber by the minute..beleive all sorts of BS.

See this is the type of stuff I feel the need to comment on, what about you makes you so superior that you can come on a forum and make some condescending, prickish remark like that? Oh  yeah and by the way, it has been confirmed countless times that the footage that we are seeing is taken from Alpha stage months ago. Not indicitive of the current state of the game, but how it was MONTHS ago.

Do i know how good the game will look, no I don't. But based simply on their track record I do believe that Halo 3 will look amazing by release time. I fancy this development approach that the teams at Forza and for Halo have taken, they are getting the gameplay right and then focusing on the graphics at the end. Seems to me as if the have their priorities straight,nothing wrong with that. 

Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts
Ha ha! Yeah dude this was pretty good. I was laughing all the way throughour!
Avatar image for tuddalicious
tuddalicious

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 tuddalicious
Member since 2005 • 174 Posts
[QUOTE="yoddahasbadodda"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="donalbane"][QUOTE="flazzle"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="Nteks"]

I had them running at the same time on 2 HDTV's.

Got to hand it to Lems Shivering Isles looks Better but now by much.

DaddyDC650

I don't think so. First of all, IGN has stated that the PS3 version of Oblivion looks and runs better than the 360 version AFTER it was patched. Shivering Isles is an expansion pack and uses the same exact graphics engine. I don't see how an expansion pack can run on a different graphics engine than the original game itself...... I own a PC and every expansion pack that I've played featured the same graphics engine. Usually the only difference graphically is the art style.....

Yes. It was stated the PS3 not only looked better, but had better framerates as well. Thats pretty impressive.

Yes, but they weren't comparing it to Shivering Isles, which runs off the HD. The PS3 version only looks better because of this MASSIVE installation. If the 360 Oblivion installed 4.6 gigs like the PS3 version, it would be better looking than the PS3 version. Since SI runs off the HD, it looks better than even the PS3 version. It's not a different engine, the assets are just loaded much faster off of HD vs Optical discs.

Since the PS3 has RAM limitations, if Shivering Isles does come out for PS3, it will have to be on a disc, which is why it will look worse than Oblivion did on the 360 BEFORE it got the update.

Having the game installed on the hard drive doesn't make it LOOK better. It makes it RUN better.

Exactly! It might load a little faster but having the game on the hard drive is not going to improve graphics. Lmao!!! The game runs on the same graphics engine so no, the graphics do not look better than the PS3 version of Oblivion. Btw, the PS3 is more powerful, it's been confirmed by tons of developers and even IGN's own editor-in-chief of Xbox 360 has admitted this.

It that why, epicgames said ps3 couldnt handle gears of? war? is that why the darkness confirmed by dev 360 version will have better textures because of more memory usable? the only thing more powerful in ps3 is the cell and that's not even a gaming focused cpu, it's mainly multimedia, 360 cpu is gaming, plus xbox360 cpu can be used for processing physics and gpu, ps3 can only use the cell for physics.

overall xbox360 is more powerful, ps3 has more peak on paper performance, but in real world xbox360 is more powerful.

Is that why the new Unreal Tournament for the PS3 looks better than Gears of War and runs at a blistering frame rate according to previews? Pwned!

You talking about that Unreal Tournament that is releasing for the 360 as well? Lol, pick up your face on your way out.
  • 40 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4