Bioware makes RPGs, but Neverwinter Nights doesn't have many similarities to KOTOR. Bungie made Marathon, which was a FPS, and when they made Halo, it was very different from their Marathon games. But Tetris Attack and Pokemon Puzzle League, while not the same franchise, use the exact same gameplay mechanics, so one is the other's sequel.
It's easy to overreach with this reasoning, but I think the premise is sound.
People are trying to make my reasoning into a straw man (Sega 2k vs Madden... madden is not made by sega) or are trying to stretch it to the point of absurdity. Mass Effect and KOTOR are very similar games made by the same studio, with the same underlying gameplay, you might not agree, fine, but I see Mass Effect as a KOTOR sequel. I wasn't aware that was a bad thing. FF XI was a lot different than FF X, and FF XII is a huge jump from either, but they are sequels held together by a studio, gameplay, and some common themes. I don't see a great deal of difference between how it's going to feel for me to play Mass Effect versus how I felt playing KOTOR. Maybe if I had some nostalgia for the Star Wars universe, but I don't. They're sequels.
Crysis is the sequel to Far Cry... at least, the real Far Cry on PC. In fact, Crytek 2 is the engine sequel to Crytek.
Don't stretch it to the point of absurdity, and don't get so uptight about it. Mass Effect looks like a great game, but trying to pretend it's nothing like KOTOR is the only *real* stretch I see here. For someone who has played, and enjoyed, KOTOR and KOTOR II, the gameplay will be quite similar. They're not abandoning what they know works.
For it to a be sequel it would have to be a continuation of a previous story. Your argument fails on your usage of the word sequal, which is not objective.
Log in to comment