[QUOTE="twitchmonkey399"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Dual Survival may be my favorite of the three now. It's has the "real" factor of Survivorman with the entertainment factor of MVW.

[QUOTE="Velocitas8"]

Survivorman and Dual Survival are infinitely better than man Vs Wild. MVW is just horrid.Pirate700

Yeah, I could never get into Man vs. Wild.

Survivorman is great, however. Dual Survival also seems to be pretty good (only seen a couple episodes.)

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Did she own what she sold?smc91352

Ya, Id say they are snitches along with people who report others on hereStanley09

[QUOTE="taj7575"]

[QUOTE="needled24-7"]

no, the users that get butthurt and click "report abuse to moderator" are the snitches.

THE_DRUGGIE

This. I'm sure theres a few out there too who wait for that perfect insult on a debate thread too..:x

Not to mention post history sifters who like reporting posts that happened ages ago.

Seriously, there should be a time cutoff for legit reports.

[QUOTE="twitchmonkey399"]

[QUOTE="XilePrincess"]Of course she can be a "good" girl. Your boyfriend doing something =/= you doing it.XilePrincess

But your willingness to date someone who is bad says something about yourself, even if you don't participate in or condone his actions.

It's like if I regurlarly played billiards and drank beer with Hitler during WWII, and excused myself by saying, "My friend doing it =/= me doing it."

Er... I'd think most people know the line between being a murderer and being a "bad boy". There is obviously a pretty easily defined line between being a bit rebellious and killing people.

While it's true that I used an extreme example, my point still stands as I used it to disprove your rational.

It's still the same idea, albeit on different levels. You are showing something about yourself when you allow yourself to participate in friendly relations with people who do bad things, be them atrocious or questionable.

Of course, the relevance of my point depends on what one considers to be a "bad boy." How that term is used does not stop at just being mildly rebellious. My point would apply to, butis not limited to, those girls who are willing to date petty thieves, habitual traffic law violators, those who affiliate with illegal drug dealings, etc., all of which could be found in one who is considered a "bad boy."

Of course she can be a "good" girl. Your boyfriend doing something =/= you doing it.XilePrincess

But your willingness to date someone who is bad says something about yourself, even if you don't participate in or condone his actions.

It's like if I regurlarly played billiards and drank beer with Hitler during WWII, and excused myself by saying, "My friend doing it =/= me doing it."

They are great and Im a guy, you need to make your own band then and not hateBanjo_Kongfooie

[QUOTE="twitchmonkey399"][QUOTE="Stanley09"] I dont even know if this is worth arguing anymore...you guys seem too ignorant... I reccomend going to shroomery.org message boards and make a thread explaining your "reasons" why marijuana should be illegal. hahaha they will own you. also watch the movie "the business behind getting high" its just a google away and you can watch it for free. very informative for everyone. also.... http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm is it REALLY worth it to keep drugs illegal?

Stanley09

You know what I think is funny? You pry bloodling for evidence, then when he gives it, you say "Oh well it doesn't matter anyway." And now, you completely disregard my post and say "Hah you guys are so ignorant, I'll let other smarter people deal with you." Ironic, don't you think? What's more, I haven't said whether I support legalization or not. Go check the last post on the the first page. That I find interesting.

Mental illness over cancer? What? What does that have to do with anything I said? Are you sure you quoted the right person? And quite convincing? I already said I haven't revealed my position in this debate, so there's no need for you to direct your arguments at me.