but Target doesn't know anything about what a game should be priced at.

All they know is that the msrp was 19.99 when they bought it a year ago, and there gonna make their money.

agreed. Ive been playing avi's on my 360 since launch.darksusperia

I'm like 95% sure he meant xvids.

Does anyone know if this is the lost chapters version or the original:original?

So far it looks like its just the regular version, but this seems like a foolish move on microsofts part. Plus it's almost impossible to imagine.

Gears, and Assassins Creed,.

Motion seconded

Your right! assuming that everyone had an xbox and owned all those game.

and by the way 15$ is too expensive? maybe your just poor, I spend more than that on cofee drinks every week, and think its a fine deal.

Sure the disc is cheaper if you go to a gamestop and find one that works, but discs can sratch or break, something whichmy hard drive won't do. I'm happy for the chance to finnally play some of these games I've heard so much about.

Taking all things into concideration, This is awfully shady, I've been all over these forums for a while getting a fair view of both sides of the situation. This is what I have come up with for the defenders of eidos:

1"They never said that was a review score"

2:"Those starsare reallybullet points"

3:"Those comments were up way before the game came out, including the stars."

What I have for the attackers of eidos.

1:"There is updated information, therefore there is no reason to use the old quotes"

2:Bullet points are used to seperate different points. What are the stars being used for here?

3:"By placing 5 stars next to a comment that says the game is great, You are inviting people to assume the game got a 5 star review.

I am on the side against eidos, because It seems shady to have those comment on the main front page, shown one at a time with the stars (they even have a glowing exploding effect to the graphic) visible in front of each comment. since neither of these sources (to my knowledge) review games in stars, it looks like eidos has already been preplanning an escape tactic in case somone noticed.

EDIT: I see now that gamespy does in fact review with stars. I don't know if this helps or hurts their cause.

This isn't correct. not at all, not even a little bit. Everygame uses a different amount of resources.

Xbox live arcade games take up very little memory, games with straming content like assassins creed or crack down, will use slightly more resources than a game that loads to ram, such as stuntman ignition or tenchuz. :)

Well theXbox is nowhere near it's limit graphically check it out.

Processor=3 symmetrical cores running at 3.2 GHz each, with acache of 1meg.

Graphics card= An unbelievably fast independent graphicscard that is still pretty much the best you could realistically obtain for a PC today.

It can display 900 million polygons and 9 billion operations a second, thats like a supercomputer.

512mg Gddr3 ram that is 700 mhz,

With the setup like it is , it is conceivably better than almost anyones computer. Short answer is no.

99.99% of the people in any posisition of power in ANY industry, are focused soleley on the one act of taking as much money from you as possible.

To think that someones going to make a website just for his concern of the gaming community is retarded. I'm not saying he won't make his own site, or that he won't post unbiased reviews. But I am saying whatever he chooses to do, it will probably be for the money. Just like everything gamespot, or ign, or gamefaqs, or any other game/non-game related companies/websites does. (do?)