[QUOTE="unholymight"] If you look at Charles Sanders Peirce's solution to the liar's paradox, the answer for our case here would be: "Not nothing can be shown to be true". Vandalvideo
If it is not not X, then isn't that X? Not nothing can be shown to be true means something can be shown to be true right.
Not nothing here should mean "some things can be shown to be true but not necessarily everything". This is because the given solution would only conclude that our statement is false.
Yes that is what it means. Do you have something else to say about it?
Log in to comment