Is this really needed?

[QUOTE="Stats_"]

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

There could be many reasons for that such as the devs lowering the PC version visuals to make them look on par, we shall know when the game launches. Because the PC version should have more visuals if they are going to use DX11 tech like they said they were.

MC3887

The Gamespot preview was sometime ago, as i said they and has been wrote already in this thread they have obviously improved the PC versions visuals above and beyond that of the 360 versions. They claim the 360 version will be equal to a custom setting somewhat above medium.

The high setting and maybe the very high setting will be the one with the DX11 features.

DX11 is probably very high only, 360(if it lives up to video and what they said) medium-high to high.

Thanks for the info:)

[QUOTE="Kickinurass"]

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

so Just Wait

I doubt Halo reach will get 9.5 you better hope it at least get's a aaae at best or major pwnage will happen.

sales lol yay it will sell good snore. ( I personally don't care if it sells good )

remember halos losing it's apeal the sales of odst and halo wars are horrible if halo reach was called halo 4 maybe it will sell at the level of halo 3, but look at odst a fullfledged game by microsoft and is selling poorly.

the gameplay and online i'll wait till I see HaloReach get a 9.5 or above lol it could flop like halo wars

vashxsk8erx12

I sincerely doubt you've even played Halo after your little remark yesterday. And Halo ODST sold 2 million in two days and Halo Wars was among the best selling console RTS - I fail to see how its losing its appeal.

You're making it rather obvious you have no idea what your talking about when it comes to Halo.

Ummm, its called adding "halo" too the title which gets there products bought. I'm sorry but Halo War's may be the best console RTS but in the RTS genre its garbage. Halo ODST is bad as well. Just a way too milk money. Hopefully they actually take time for Reach, i'm looking forward too it.

I take that back about halo war's being the best console RTS, command and conquer for the N64.

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]it will, and more, it will kill UC2 in sales, gameplay,online and storyline,Halo 3 already scored a 9.5, so this will definitly match it, you can keep your generic third person action adventure with the pretty graphics, we all know which is the better and more popular franchise and we all know which game people will still be playing in 3 years time, because Halo franchise has one thing the uncharted franchise will never have, staying powerKickinurass

so Just Wait

I doubt Halo reach will get 9.5 you better hope it at least get's a aaae at best or major pwnage will happen.

sales lol yay it will sell good snore. ( I personally don't care if it sells good )

remember halos losing it's apeal the sales of odst and halo wars are horrible if halo reach was called halo 4 maybe it will sell at the level of halo 3, but look at odst a fullfledged game by microsoft and is selling poorly.

the gameplay and online i'll wait till I see HaloReach get a 9.5 or above lol it could flop like halo wars

I sincerely doubt you've even played Halo after your little remark yesterday. And Halo ODST sold 2 million in two days and Halo Wars was among the best selling console RTS - I fail to see how its losing its appeal.

You're making it rather obvious you have no idea what your talking about when it comes to Halo.

Ummm, its called adding "halo" too the title which gets there products bought. I'm sorry but Halo War's may be the best console RTS but in the RTS genre its garbage. Halo ODST is bad as well. Just a way too milk money. Hopefully they actually take time for Reach, i'm looking forward too it.

Its the truth, i'm not laughing and saying "the 360 is going too look like **** Its comparing the PC to a 360...

All in all, it will play and look better on the PC, the 360 may look as good as the screen shots but still won't look AS good as the PC.

Lets end this comparison BS! PC and 360 Gamers have something t:Do look forward too

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

Perhaps, but the knee jerk reaction of lemmings was to not only use this as anti Killzone 2 material; but also to suggest several years of technological progress has done nothing to push PC ahead of 360 capability (claiming they're equal).

I've been watching this game on GameTrailers before they polished the graphics up, now suddenly it gets attention.

brennan7777

no question the PC is ahead of the 360 but all indications point to them looking near identical which is good news for 360 owners...the PC version could of course look better if the devs wanted it to no doubt

IF the 360 version looks just as good as the PC version, GJ to the Devs for pushing the hardware to that level. But I still think its unlikely that it will look that good.

It shouldn't turn into a graphics argument. Its obvious that those are PC screens, No console looks that good so far, look at the bump map on the sand bags and how the lighting hits it. Those are things you notice in PC games.

[QUOTE="vashxsk8erx12"]

Hire a movie director to actually write a decent story for single player. Really now, what happen to stories in games nowadays. I miss the times when you beat a single player game and you feel good about beating it. Not just the fact that you got through the game but the joy having that story driven experience. Seems like all developers care about is gameplay and graphics. IMO, story goes hand in hand with gameplay. Graphics is just the topping to add too the experience. Am I the only one that feels this way?:|

gamer620

Haha I didn't even catch myself typing that. Thanks for the correction..I agree with you for the most part but I think Avatar was a okay story, I think for the most part the movie is just visually pleasing and thats about it. The characters in that movie were dull and foregetable, the only one that actually stood out was the colonel or sergeant(not sure which).

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

And this is why 360 graphics are so underhyped here. why exactly do you think 360 cant run those graphics? Im pretty sure if it was a PS3/PC game everyone would be claiming it the new console graphics king :?

topgunmv

To be honest I don't think the 360 version could have such detailed textures with so much AA and lighting.. I could be wrong though I'm no dev.

I doubt it too, though to be fair I think every shot shown so far is in an extremely confined space.

I agree, 360 will probably not look that good. Lighting,Textures,Bump maps look great though. Glad I have a high end PC :)

Arma 2 is beautiful in graphic's. Thats one game that requires a High end PC to run it too its full potential that also means more than 30fps which is more than the average player on that game.