[QUOTE="Mograine"]

[QUOTE="tehsystemwarior"] People like to forget CoD 4's problems and dwell on MW2s. Nostalgia does not make a game good.tehsystemwarior

Hahahahaahahaha "nostalgia" for a game that came out in 2007.

This made my day :lol:

Especially when they played the game when they were ten years old.

I would not have to explain if one played the game.

Golden_Boy187

Can you not read? Or are you calling him a liar? More ad hominem?

I enjoyed the hell out of CoD 4, WaW, and Black Ops, but I know for the fact they all offer nearly identical gameplay. I played through MW2 and MW3 looks exactly like it just set in a little different location. That's it.

Wasdie

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="-supercharged-"]

That's the thing it's not just a new skin every game. Your saying that every game has the same exact weapons, killstreaks, maps ect?Get real dude

Golden_Boy187

The weapons don't act much different from year to year, the killstreaks and perks are all pretty much the same and have no real impact on the gameplay, the maps are the thing most unique about each CoD game, but they are always so damn small the flow of the game is never really different from map to map.

In the end you get the exact same paced game with the same gameplay year after year. They don't try to vary it up at all. Did you not see the E3 2011 trailer? Everything was ripped from older CoD games and repainted. A boat chase scene? Don't. Underwater section? Done. Taking over some seavessel? Done. Protecting a Stryker as it moves down a street? Done.

Same exact animations, same graphics engine, same nearly everything with a new coat of paint. They aren't even trying. They know for a fact their fanbase doesn't want anything new, they want the same game with a new coat of paint. They want another 15 prestiges to show how long they have played the game for. They want repetition. They are comfortable with the same.

It's their money, they can spend it on what they want. I wouldn't waste your time trying to convince people on a video game board, all of which are much more aware of the entire video game market, that CoD isn't the same game and it's always worth the $60. The fact is, it's not. I enjoyed the hell out of CoD 4, WaW, and Black Ops, but I know for the fact they all offer nearly identical gameplay. I played through MW2 and MW3 looks exactly like it just set in a little different location. That's it.

I can tell you never really played any of COD games.

every weapon plays differently and any real COD player knows that.

"Perks & killstreaks have no impact on gameplay" LOOOOL WOOOOOW

Every map has to be played differently and has a different flow. PLZ STOP THE HATING

Edit: Going to steal some other dude's way of posting a bit hope he doesn't mind.

Trying to diminish someone's argument by questioning their credibility, logical fallacy.

Ad hominem, saying he's not a real video gamer.

You didn't even present an argument. All you did was say he was wrong.

A Mod responding to an obvious troll thread?

Well okay then. It's kind of funny to watch.

In about five more posts OP will resort to ad hominem and other logical fallacies before saying. "Yeah that's just your opinion man"

Activision ;_; so many great games. Don't forget about that loveable chap Bobby Kotick too =(((

Here's a reminder for you people....

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

MOTHER 3

And guess what? It's better than all three of those titles combined.
You are never going to get them so just... see pic.

[QUOTE="russiaAK47"]

now that the resident evil game has flopped, is there any reason at all in owning a 3ds? i mean everyone gets a headache when using the 3d, it only has 1 analog stick, the graphics are again sub par, is there any reason at all in owning a 3ds?

bbkkristian

Game has to have hype in order to flop, in this case there was no hype, so it could not flop. Everyone gets a headache? Wow, if everyone was then the Health administration would've said something by now and it would say it in the Health and Safety information.Are you new to handheld gaming? I figured you would be used to it by now. If you want another analog for a camera, that Virtual Boy has two D pads. Someone hasn't seen the improvement from the DS to 3DS. Yes, there is, you're judging a book completely by its cover and once you actually get one, you'll see that it has much more to offer.

Now that we're done here. /thread....

Just stopping by to say I like your whole coloring approach.

[QUOTE="volchcha"]

[QUOTE="masterdante"]

And you'll notice at no point did i bash the Wii U, i only questioned the timing of it. That is all.

VendettaRed07

The timing is fine refer to my post. It's the same life cycle as other consoles. I think you're just upset that the Wiiu will have a two year headstart on your favorite console.

He's talking about the timing because the hardware from what we have seen so far might not be that far above the 360 and ps3.. And if the next microsoft and sony systems release not to long after, nintendo is going to be in the hole with the multiplats again because it might be the wii all over again where developers skip it for the better tech. systems.

I see what hes saying but the gap no matter what won't be as big as it was between the Wii and Ps3 and 360 just due to the resolution alone. So until we hear more about the WiiU what the actual specs are and what the PS4 and 720 we can't jump to conclusions

which lets face it we have no idea if those will be a massive step up either, Nintendo proved this generation you don't need to do that to come in first so I think it is premature to just assume that they are going to go all out and make these super powerful systems. They might just make their own gimmicky motion console as well.

I don't have a source on this handy... if you want to look it up fine. I recall some developer claiming the Wiiu is 1.5 times more powerful than a PS3 and 360 combined. But that doesn't matter. Consoles with inferior hardware have always sold more, see the PS2 and Wii.

In shooters health should regen but stop at 20% untill you find a health pack.

In other games absolutely NO regenerating health.

It may have a headstart, but the question is will it keep up once the other systems are released? Speculation, i know, but i find it hard to believe it will be that far ahead of what 360 and PS3 are offering now. Does that appease your smugness?

masterdante

Yes, because developers will have developed for the Wiiu for at least a year. They will know how to utilize it's full power but they still have to break in the new consoles.
Ever notice how early 360 games look like crap compared to the later ones?