wackapacka's forum posts

Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts
Uncharted by far
Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts
At least there's no 14 second load screen every 30 second(Fable) in Killzone 2
Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts

[QUOTE="wackapacka"] Now you're pissing me off. Have you ever heard about M.A.G? It has 256 player competetive! The xbox cannot pull this off due to its CPU. Fable 2 does NOT have large levels. What about Bowerstone, Town square to oldtown LOAD, oldtown to garden LOAD, garden to town square LOAD, town square to bower lake LOAD. And those areas aren't even big. I HAVE played Fable 2, and it did not impress me at allobamanian

I do not care for MAG, in fact i do not play online games, and i rarely really like shooters, plus the 256 players does not impress me any bit for some reason

Fable 2 has huge levels, if you play it, be sure to visit Oakfield and the Lake regions, those are vast

Like Oblivion had loading in towns and houses, Fable 2 has some loading also, but has some vast areas too

In fact Fable 2 has no loading in houses like Oblivion and bigger city areas

Oblivion impressed me, Fable 2 however did not. Yes, i know in Oblivion there's loading screens, BUT i can walk all over the map(-towns) with no loading screens. Fable 2 was generic too me, boring combat, way to easy and a boring story. Once you get a lvl 5 Spell you can kill anything. In Oblivion, every person had its own personality and look. Another thing that annoyed me in Fable 2, was that: In RPG's i like choosing a class(Mage,Warrior,Archer ect.) In Fable 2 you could get good at everything. 256 player competetive does NOT impress you? I don't what to say.....
Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts
[QUOTE="obamanian"][QUOTE="wackapacka"]

Played Fable 2 120 hours? Fable 2 is walk 50 yards 14 second load screen repeat. Resistance 2 beats EVERY shooter on the 360 in terms of scale. 300 Hundred ft bosses, 8 player coop, 60 player competetive? Halo 3, 1 ft bosses(little orb thingy) 4 player coop, 16 competetive LOL.

God of war 3, small? it beats just about every game you named in terms of scale.

Uncharted, small levels? There's a loading screen every hour, that meens the levels are huge, just not open. Mgs4, small levels? At least there's not a loading screen every 2 seconds like in fable 2...

I'm no fanboy, but please stop this, when you know the PS3 can pull off bigger games thanks to Bluray and more powerfull CPU

Have you played Fable 2, MGS4 and Uncharted ?

From what i see so far, only 360 can pull off huge game worlds, with vast detail and scale, plus next gen visuals, since PS3 has nothing like Fable 2, KUF2, Banjo 3, Alan Wake, Two Worlds Tempation, Divinity 2, Risen, Venetica etc in terms of scale, detail, next gen visuals combination from what i have seen

It is obvious to me that 360 can pull off far bigger game worlds due to vastly better ram design, more ram and a far more advanced GPU

Both Uncharted, MGS4 and now KZ2 have tiny and linear levels, that is what i see

Now you're pissing me off. Have you ever heard about M.A.G? It has 256 player competetive! The xbox cannot pull this off due to its CPU. Fable 2 does NOT have large levels. What about Bowerstone, Town square to oldtown LOAD, oldtown to garden LOAD, garden to town square LOAD, town square to bower lake LOAD. And those areas aren't even big. I HAVE played Fable 2, and it did not impress me at all
Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts

Played Fable 2 120 hours? Fable 2 is walk 50 yards 14 second load screen repeat. Resistance 2 beats EVERY shooter on the 360 in terms of scale. 300 Hundred ft bosses, 8 player coop, 60 player competetive? Halo 3, 1 ft bosses(little orb thingy) 4 player coop, 16 competetive LOL.

God of war 3, small? it beats just about every game you named in terms of scale.

Uncharted, small levels? There's a loading screen every hour, that meens the levels are huge, just not open. Mgs4, small levels? At least there's not a loading screen every 2 seconds like in fable 2...

I'm no fanboy, but please stop this, when you know the PS3 can pull off bigger games thanks to Bluray and more powerfull CPU

Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts

In hardware? No. In sales? No. In games? No. In online? No.

Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts

1. Obviously Halo

2. Wii [somthing] games

3. Fifa

4. GTA

5. Gears of war

Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts
[QUOTE="BetaRay"]

I say Uncharted has better character models, Gears 2 has better lighting and the Leviathan looked incredible

There is no leviathan in Gears 2, there is one in Resistance 2
Avatar image for wackapacka
wackapacka

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 wackapacka
Member since 2009 • 113 Posts
There is no leviathan in Gears 2, there is one in Resistance 2