Which is of course, an ad hominem. It's not his definitions or reasoning you question, but how he presents them.Danm_999That would be true if I had said anything other than what I actually said, which was that the presentation is why athiests are hated. That is not a value judgement of the content, therefore, all who claim otherwise are using cheap shots and circling the wagons. :)
whatrevolution's forum posts
Log in to comment