@notafanboy said:
Microsoft deserves the ass-whopping their getting. Anyone who votes no is a fanboy.
MS doesn't invest in first party, they hire incompetent engineers (Seriously... You hire 5,000 engineers and all of them got bested by a single man?), they started all the bad crap in gaming (Pay2play peer2peer online gaming, paid DLC, etc.) and if they were in the lead they'd probably have pushed even more anti-consumer practices. If MS weren't so stubborn, they'd have removed pay2play online gaming by now, but they're still clinging onto that fantasy that they'll regain their 360 heyday and make bank off gold subscriptions, which SONY has stolen through their own PS+ subscription. Those days are long gone, but MS is too blinded by greed to accept that fact. As long as SONY continues to charge for online play as well, very few people will buy the current Xbox and future Xbox.
MS should just leave the industry so another company can join. Anyone who isn't a fanboy would agree. Bad competition isn't good for the industry. If google joined the industry, you can bet that online gaming would be free on google's console, forcing SONY to do the same.
What does it say about Sony when they suddenly offer paid memberships after two generations of of allowing people to play games for free on the PS2 and PS3 or still push paid DLC despite being the the top company this generation.
Sony could have fixed alot of the mistakes you slam Microsoft for, but they are perfectly happy counting their sacks of money and making third-parties happy who do want paid DLC to be pushed.
Sony is just blinded by greed, and the only reason why they have been successful this generation is because Nintendo and Microsoft both fumbled the football and Sony picked it up and ran with it.
Nintendo came out with a system that had a terrible gimmick and poor marketing, while Microsoft kept shooting themselves in the foot with bad press up to the Xbox One's launch. Pretty much all Sony had to do was not say or do anything to upset their audience, and they would have been successful.
As for Sony being a consumer friendly company, that is a funny joke. Did you forget that this is the same company that charged 500 bucks for a PS3 and then insulted their fanbase by acting arrogant about it? Or their stance against 2D games in the past?
I'm not saying Microsoft is a saint, but Sony is no better. They could have done any number of positive things to
"repair" the damage that Microsoft had supposedly caused, but they are happy sitting on their throne selling online memberships(that were not needed to play online with any previous Playstation console), pushing DLC(including Call of Duty) and buying up exclusives.
In other words, Sony is playing the same game Microsoft did last generation.
Log in to comment