why care about what they look like seriously......the ps3 version looks slightly brighter,but again,who cares? x360 and pc version are > cuz they have DLC (3 in total) while ps3 doesnt.....the dlc advantage is too big since it lets you get 10 more levels,more guns,enemies,perks EVERYTHING!!! AND PLUS YOU FINALy can play after finishing the game...and see project purity in action.
whybuyaxbox360's forum posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]
So, I guess i'll take that for no...
Next time, i'll try to pay games monthly...
again, if one can't afford the service, then one shouldn't buy it. doesn't matter if its monthly or yearly. $50 isn't going to break most people.But *ALL* people *ARE* being ripped off if they do pay.
Do you pay your car company an additional $50 a year so you can drive on motor ways?
hahahaha thatd be sum ******* up stuff if u did.the guy in charge of XBL is a genius, making people believe that PAYING to PLAY a game you already PAID for is 'cool'.
People ALWAYS forget that 'XBOX LIVE' is also on PC, ALL its FEATURES, and EVERYTHING, I repeat the EXACT SAME LIVE on XBOX is the EXACT SAME THING ON PC, yet, initially they wanted to CHARGE PC gamers, but PC gamers as smart as they are, REFUSED to PAY, thats why 'XBOX LIVE' on PC is 100% FREE. yet they still charge 360 players, why because 360 players are willing to pay, so why should they stop.
FACT: if every 360 gamers refuses to PAY for LIVE, MS will make it FREE. but people just cant get enough of Halo and Gears, and MS knows this, thats why MS will forever keep charging 360 gamers for XBL.
Anyone who thinks MS CANT AFFORD to make it FREE, or the FEES the gamers PAY actually help them make it a better service, is either a kid, teen or a complete idiot.
so why is XBL a paid service? because people refuse NOT to pay for it. nothing more, nothing less.
Thank you for reading. please feel free to agree, disagree, flame, ice, shield or whatever.
if ppl did that it would be a.......REVOLUTION!!!![QUOTE="TheGrat1"]Show me any currently released 36 that looks better than KZ2 and i'll be inclined to agree with you.ronjon_09
http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/718963/mass-effect/images/mass-effect-20060512020812888.html
hahaha mass effect DOES NOT look anywhere near as good as killzone are u kiddin? this has to be the most ridiculous comment ever.....its funny cuz lems always use GEARS......since it IS the best looking 360 game...but i guess they gave up dat arguement seeing as it wasnt going anywhere...nows its mass flop that looks best :D AWESOME!Oh and this as well:
:lol: at the people who think this looks good
there's plenty of gamecube games that look better then that
well maybe not PLENTY...but theres still a couple...
agreed. ............grapgiclly obvious resistance 2 looks alot better,gameplay wise...well theyre both aboiut the same imo.....resiatnce was way more fun in single player,halo 3 SP sucks really really really bad....the MP goes to halo tho.....its just made to perfection.
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]
Kinda like the PS2? I didn't see no warranty.
lulz.
There was a 1 year warranty son.
What does the PS2 have to do with this topic?Way to autorespond/defend RROD and E74. You won the 1 millionth defense trophy!
Read : PS3.
If you want to discuss the crap the PS2 went through, it's old hat...and the Xbox had issues too, but who cares right, let's bring NES into this, let's just bring every dang piece of crap in this topic to confuse everyone. Kia's blow too.
This thread is about faulty xbox hardware, someone mentioned the PS3, you then said ask Sony to make faulty hardware ... which they do. Nes has nothing to do with this. It is you who is getting defencive :0 I couldnt care less about the xbox being made out of garbage condensed into box form. he said tell sony to make faulty PS3 hardware sir.....
Log in to comment