In my opinion, none of the games you mention all are that impressive outside of Halo 5 and Tomb Raider (which is a timed exclusive). The Halo series have taken a nose dive since bungie stoped making it, and I am not really impress with the new one at all. You also left out important Playstation exclusive like Persona 5 (Only on Ps4/PS3), No man's sky (PC/PS4 exclusive) and MLB the show 2015 (sonly esclusive game). I knew this was going to boil into a system war, which is silly in my opinion. I personally would not trade either system for each other. But if I had to go with one I would go with a PS4 or a Wii U over Xbox One, mainly for the fact that I really do not see any exclusive games worth playing on the system.

Not really, a game is should be based on how it plays first and not just base on how it looks plain and simple.

Huh? Game looks great graphically, I find that everyone that plays it just talks about the way it looks and not the way it plays or holds up, it is annoying imo.

I have the game, interested to see what people are saying of it, I bought it base on people on twitter and a couple of people praising it. (Totalbiscut and ign especially)...

PC, followed by Nintendo

PC, when it goes on sale

What else can they really do, they can add a bunch of filler in there to lengthen the game, but who would this help really?

I truly believe that g anyone company that goes digital would be setting themselves up for failure in my honest opinion. It is true that numbers indicate that more people buy games digitally then physically, but it is nowhere near wear it needs to be in order to justify cutting out the middle man. There are still a huge portion of gamers that like to have physically copies of games in their hands.

@flamydragon86: If the developers said it is a timed exlusive it will be out in 2016 for the PS4.